You making factually incorrect statements. Please do some basic diligence

But yeah regime are pedos, no doubt about it.

Did the feds charge the other people caught in the same sting? I'm not seeing any articles about the fed vs state charges.

But it doesn’t understand - at least not in the sense humans do. When you give it a prompt, it breaks it into tokens, matches those against its training data, and generates the most statistically likely continuation. It doesn’t “know” what it’s saying, it’s just producing the next most probable output. That’s why it often fails at simple tasks like counting letters in a word - it isn’t actually reading and analyzing the word, just predicting text. In that sense it’s simulating understanding, not possessing it.

I am not sure.

I tried looking more into but can't even find articles I saw last week now.

Recent did say the Israeli skipped his court hearing yesterday though.

You're entering a more philosophical debate than a technical one, because for this point to make any sense, you'd have to define what "understanding" language means for a human in a level as low as what you're describing for an LLM.

Can you affirm that what a human brain does to understand language is so different to what an LLM does?

I'm not saying an LLM is smart, but saying that it doesn't understand, when having computers "understand" natural language is the core of NLP, is meh.

Of course they are. They are a literal data farm. People need to stop using it.

Exactly.

This is going to be the next Google searches thing, isn't it. People being ignorant to, or forgetting that corporations are saying everything they say or do. And then bring all shocked when they get exploited for profits or reported to authorities for doing shady things.

Rinse and repeat.

No they're not they're talking purely at a technical level and you're trying to apply mysticism to it.

Yo, I was just joking about making a gallon of PCP

This sounds like PR deflection from egging on the kid to suicide. But I still don't doubt it.

There are anonymous GPT version out there.

example:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=DuckDuckGo+AI+Chat&ia=chat&duckai=1&atb=v382-1

I've seen several others as well.

Pretty much every corporately owned service on the Internet actively spies on you for the police.

An important thing to understand as authoritarians take control of governments and start using this comprehensive spying apparatus to target political opponents.

Learn to use your computer. Use open sourced tools and software, invest in your own hardware and host your own services. It doesn’t require years of learning or study, you can often get by with a video or two.

My Jellyfin server doesn’t call the police. My local language models don’t store everything I’ve ever written. Nobody is scanning my NextCloud server or mining my Signal/Matrix/Jami contacts to determine my social graph.

All of this is running on cheap leftover hardware (with some new hard drives) and I save over $100/mo on the equivalent services. And way more if you consider access to every streaming service with exclusive content.

Windows is spying on you, Meta is spying on you, Google is spying on you, Amazon is spying on you, OpenAI is spying on you.

They do this because they make it slightly easier to use software and so people give up every bit of privacy and autonomy for their entire lives just to avoid reading a wiki or learning a technical skill.

I don’t think that that is a good deal.

Eww, the teeth of my victims plastered all around my house.

I was just doing a cirizen's audit, your honor.

You want an ablated model for that

Paint exterior not interior.

You’re right - in the NLP field, LLMs are described as doing “language understanding,” and that’s fine as long as we’re clear what that means. They process natural language input and can generate coherent output, which in a technical sense is a kind of understanding.

But that shouldn’t be confused with human-like understanding. LLMs simulate it statistically, without any grounding in meaning, concepts or reference to the world. That’s why earlier GPT models could produce paragraphs of flawless grammar that, once you read closely, were complete nonsense. They looked like understanding, but nothing underneath was actually tied to reality.

So I’d say both are true: LLMs “understand” in the NLP sense, but it’s not the same thing as human understanding. Mixing those two senses of the word is where people start talking past each other.

Sam Altman belongs in prison. His machine encouraged and guided a child to kill themselves. His machine actively stopped that child seeking outside help. Sam Altman belongs in prison. Sam Altman does not need another $20,000,000,000,000. He needs to go through the legal system and be sentenced and sent to prison because his machine pushed a child to suicide.

RIP Trevor. Still can’t believe he died trying to suck his own dick

It’s evidence that can be argued is intent. People have been convicted of murder and evidence they googled how to do it was on their computers and used in court