Skip to content

How the US is turning into a mass techno-surveillance state

Technology
66 45 629
  • Oh My God, TAKE IT DOWN Kills Parody

    Technology technology
    24
    1
    115 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    316 Aufrufe
    P
    Rules for thee...
  • Delivering BlogOnLemmy worldwide in record speeds

    Technology technology
    3
    28 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    43 Aufrufe
    kernelle@0d.gsK
    Nice to hear! I'm glad you enjoyed it.
  • New Orleans debates real-time facial recognition legislation

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    150 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    121 Aufrufe
    A
    [image: 62e40d75-1358-46a4-a7a5-1f08c6afe4dc.jpeg] Palantir had a contract with New Orleans starting around ~2012 to create their predictive policing tech that scans surveillance cameras for very vague details and still misidentifies people. It's very similar to Lavender, the tech they use to identify members of Hamas and attack with drones. This results in misidentified targets ~10% of the time, according to the IDF (likely it's a much higher misidentification rate than 10%). Palantir picked Louisiana over somewhere like San Francisco bc they knew it would be a lot easier to violate rights and privacy here and get away with it. Whatever they decide in New Orleans on Thursday during this Council meeting that nobody cares about, will likely be the first of its kind on the books legal basis to track civilians in the U.S. and allow the federal government to take control over that ability whenever they want. This could also set a precedent for use in other states. Guess who's running the entire country right now, and just gave high ranking army contracts to Palantir employees for "no reason" while they are also receiving a multimillion dollar federal contract to create an insane database on every American and giant data centers are being built all across the country.
  • 370 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    310 Aufrufe
    hollownaught@lemmy.worldH
    Bit misleading. Tumour-associated antigens can very easily be detected very early. Problem is, these are only associated with cancer, and provide a very high rate of false positives They're better used as a stepping stone for further testing, or just seeing how advanced a cancer is That is to say, I'm assuming that's what this is about, as i didnt rwad the article. It's the first thing I thought of when I heard "cancer in bloodstream", as the other options tend to be a bit more bleak Edit: they're talking about cancer "shedding genetic material", which I hate how general they're being. Probably talking about proto oncogenes from dead tumour debris, but seems different to what I was expecting
  • 708 Stimmen
    144 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    A
    Was it Biden? Obama?
  • 73 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    297 Aufrufe
    F
    For sure they are! Meta more then the others though
  • Short summary of feature phone market in 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet