Skip to content

Big tech has spent $155 billion on AI this year. It’s about to spend hundreds of billions more

Technology
61 46 0
  • 527 Stimmen
    71 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    I like the comapirson i heared at Anne Roths(https://systemli.social/@anneroth) talk(German): You would never say: I don't need free speech because I have nothing to say. Everyone profits from data privacy and free speech and some people are depending on their life on it.
  • Itch.io has begun restoring NSFW content, but only if it’s free

    Technology technology
    32
    309 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    It does feel like a precursor to insane sht in the future, think they added ai support
  • We have installed EASY UPLOAD3R!

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The Age-Checked Internet Has Arrived

    Technology technology
    154
    1
    523 Stimmen
    154 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    irmadlad@lemmy.worldI
    Governments like everything and everyone in their own little stack and in the government's self established status quo. When Paula Protester comes along with her LGBTQ++ agenda, governments don't like that. Paula Protester represents instability to the status quo established by the ruling class. Governments don't like instability. Governments like everyone sorted, coallated, and stapled, all in their respective stacks, so dissidents and social change advocates are viewed as adversaries and are not welcome. If it's genuuinely 'for the chirren' then it would seem to me that making parents be parents and take responsibility for their child's actions would go a very long way. However, we make laws with the lowest common denominator in mind. I don't want your children involved in adult activities online. However, just like any education program, the success is determined by parental involvement in their child's daily lives, and it starts at home. It's a lot easier to make government responsible for the child's developement, than actually requiring parents to be parents. I hear parents say 'I'm not technologically inclined.' Well, get there. The safety and well being of your child hangs in the balance. Take a class, read some of the millions of step by step tutorials that exist all over the internet. Ask some questions in forums. The possibilities are endless. Protecting your child is work, just like rasing them is work, and therein lies the issue.
  • 250 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    163 Aufrufe
    rivalarrival@lemmy.todayR
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Schindler
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

    Technology technology
    235
    1
    1k Stimmen
    235 Beiträge
    5k Aufrufe
    V
    What I said is that smart people can be convinced to move to another platform. Most of my friends are not technically inclined, but it was easy to make them use it, at least to chat with me. What you did is change "smart people" with "people who already want to move", which is not the same. You then said it's not something you can choose (as you cannot choose to be rich). But I answered that you can actually choose your friends. Never did I say people who are not interested in niche technologies are not smart. My statement can be rephrased in an equivalent statement "people who cannot be convinced to change are not smart", and I stand to it.
  • 35 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    123 Aufrufe
    M
    This is what I want to know also. "AI textbooks" is a great clickbait/ragebait term, but could mean a great variety of things.