Skip to content

Tough, Tiny, and Totally Repairable: Inside the Framework 12

Technology
109 70 406
  • Breakfast Cereals Market expected to reach USD 104.07 billion by 2032

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Google faces EU antitrust complaint over AI Overviews

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    147 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    sentient_loom@sh.itjust.worksS
    That's not as clever as you think it is.
  • Large Language Model Performance Doubles Every 7 Months

    Technology technology
    53
    1
    100 Stimmen
    53 Beiträge
    216 Aufrufe
    V
    in yes/no type questions, 50% success rate is the absolute worst one can do. Any worse and you're just giving an inverted correct answer more than half the time
  • AI search finds publishers starved of referral traffic

    Technology technology
    38
    1
    117 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    139 Aufrufe
    alk@sh.itjust.worksA
    They really do! It's nice to read something that's clearly hand crafted and high quality, especially the big news roundups that you do, as opposed to the usual SEO slop most news sites have. It's a treat every time a new one comes out.
  • 165 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    126 Aufrufe
    M
    I have like a dozen Gmail accounts, and I know plenty of others who do too. Before I owned my own domain, I used the different accounts for different things.
  • X launches E2E encrypted Chat

    Technology technology
    55
    2
    10 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    191 Aufrufe
    F
    So you do have evidence? Where is it?
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    292 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • Is Washington state falling out of love with Tesla?

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    61 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    B
    These Tesla owners who love their cars but hate his involvement with government are a bit ridiculous because one of the biggest reasons he got in loved with shilling for the right is that the government was looking into regulations and investigations concerning how unsafe Tesla cars are.