Skip to content

Google Shared My Phone Number!

Technology
45 23 468
  • Google search boss says AI isn’t killing search clicks

    Technology technology
    33
    1
    118 Stimmen
    33 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    Ding ding ding If you make up a new metric then you can say there isn’t a problem.
  • A letter to the CalyxOS community

    Technology technology
    4
    36 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    A
    Even calyx with a 6 month gap in updates is better than that
  • 129 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    57 Aufrufe
    E
    You know that they only are prepared to offer cyber security experts minimum wage. I was literally looking at this yesterday, if they doubled what they are offering it would still be well short of an entry-level wage in the private sector. Up to a point you can get away with it and rely on "patriotism" to fill the difference but not to this extent.
  • AI slows down some experienced software developers, study finds

    Technology technology
    129
    1
    401 Stimmen
    129 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    damaskox@lemmy.worldD
    Ah. True. I realise it now.
  • 169 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    53 Aufrufe
    K
    But but we need to power our virtual idiot with more energy than entire countries use :((
  • AI search finds publishers starved of referral traffic

    Technology technology
    38
    1
    117 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    382 Aufrufe
    alk@sh.itjust.worksA
    They really do! It's nice to read something that's clearly hand crafted and high quality, especially the big news roundups that you do, as opposed to the usual SEO slop most news sites have. It's a treat every time a new one comes out.
  • 16 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    66 Aufrufe
    dabster291@lemmy.zipD
    Why does the title use a korean letter as a divider?
  • Why doesn't Nvidia have more competition?

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    33 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    232 Aufrufe
    B
    It’s funny how the article asks the question, but completely fails to answer it. About 15 years ago, Nvidia discovered there was a demand for compute in datacenters that could be met with powerful GPU’s, and they were quick to respond to it, and they had the resources to focus on it strongly, because of their huge success and high profitability in the GPU market. AMD also saw the market, and wanted to pursue it, but just over a decade ago where it began to clearly show the high potential for profitability, AMD was near bankrupt, and was very hard pressed to finance developments on GPU and compute in datacenters. AMD really tried the best they could, and was moderately successful from a technology perspective, but Nvidia already had a head start, and the proprietary development system CUDA was already an established standard that was very hard to penetrate. Intel simply fumbled the ball from start to finish. After a decade of trying to push ARM down from having the mobile crown by far, investing billions or actually the equivalent of ARM’s total revenue. They never managed to catch up to ARM despite they had the better production process at the time. This was the main focus of Intel, and Intel believed that GPU would never be more than a niche product. So when intel tried to compete on compute for datacenters, they tried to do it with X86 chips, One of their most bold efforts was to build a monstrosity of a cluster of Celeron chips, which of course performed laughably bad compared to Nvidia! Because as it turns out, the way forward at least for now, is indeed the massively parralel compute capability of a GPU, which Nvidia has refined for decades, only with (inferior) competition from AMD. But despite the lack of competition, Nvidia did not slow down, in fact with increased profits, they only grew bolder in their efforts. Making it even harder to catch up. Now AMD has had more money to compete for a while, and they do have some decent compute units, but Nvidia remains ahead and the CUDA problem is still there, so for AMD to really compete with Nvidia, they have to be better to attract customers. That’s a very tall order against Nvidia that simply seems to never stop progressing. So the only other option for AMD is to sell a bit cheaper. Which I suppose they have to. AMD and Intel were the obvious competitors, everybody else is coming from even further behind. But if I had to make a bet, it would be on Huawei. Huawei has some crazy good developers, and Trump is basically forcing them to figure it out themselves, because he is blocking Huawei and China in general from using both AMD and Nvidia AI chips. And the chips will probably be made by Chinese SMIC, because they are also prevented from using advanced production in the west, most notably TSMC. China will prevail, because it’s become a national project, of both prestige and necessity, and they have a massive talent mass and resources, so nothing can stop it now. IMO USA would clearly have been better off allowing China to use American chips. Now China will soon compete directly on both production and design too.