Skip to content

Who are the finest #community builders in the #activitypub ecosystem, in your opinion?

ActivityPub Test Kategorie
37 14 889
  • 0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    57 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    rood@aus.social that... is actually not a bad idea If every account exposed their time zone, then your client or server could simply delay the post the appropriate amount until it's your time zone... 10pm their time, shows up 10pm your time. oooooh.
  • 0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    190 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    pfefferle@mastodon.social only one way to find out
  • 0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    117 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    silverpill@mitra.social I thought about checking against the outbox, but there's a potential race condition that could occur if I receive the Create(Note) at roughly the same time as the community, but the community hasn't processed the activity yet. In that scenario, the activity would not be in the outbox for checking. The same thing would happen if there was some out-of-band check for object membership in a collection (not that there is one right now).
  • 0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    83 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @mastodonmigration@mastodon.online while this is a known workaround, I don't think it's a tenable long-term solution. You can have "real decentralization" without the quirks, too.
  • Moving topics

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie forumwg activitypub
    6
    0 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    161 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @trwnh@mastodon.social yes, it is in regards to audience no longer being sent out by Lemmy. While it's defined in 1b12 it seems to be ancillary now, so updating that property would mean Lemmy would need to add support for it back.. not the end of the world.
  • Live testing of remote categories

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie activitypub nodebbactivityp
    63
    2
    0 Stimmen
    63 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @pfefferle@mastodon.social just wanted to poke you about this issue again. The latest updates to NodeBB now do a webfinger backcheck to ensure that the actor has a valid webfinger entry for their purported handle. If it does not, then the user is not properly created. Mastodon also does this. This check is probably for security as well as for preventing handle collisions. The multilingual plugin in conjunction with the ActivityPub plugin creates users that share the same handle, and that causes issues with federated content. For example, this article by @jonvt@vivaldi.com will load up just fine in Mastodon, but this japanese article by @akira@vivaldi.com will not, because that second article's attributedTo is https://vivaldi.com/ja/?author=176, which fails that check (the author's ID is actually https://vivaldi.com?author=176 as per the handle backcheck) cc @AltCode
  • Peertube....

    ActivityPub Test Kategorie peertube activitypub
    12
    1
    0 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    211 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @mario@hub.somaton.com thanks, I tested that payload and it successfully edited the post, so at least from the payload point of view there is no issue. Perhaps there is a problem with the http signature on update? Is that handled differently than a create?
  • Really loving #NodeBB so far.

    Uncategorized activitypub nodebb
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    65 Aufrufe
    julian@community.nodebb.orgJ
    @deadsuperhero@social.wedistribute.org glad to hear it! I'm planning to continue working on improving our ActivityPub integration in 2025, hopefully with NLNet funding again