Skip to content

Google quietly removes net-zero carbon goal from website amid rapid power-hungry AI data center buildout — industry-first sustainability pledge moved to background amidst AI energy crisis

Technology
7 7 0
  • 165 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    dasus@lemmy.worldD
    Look at the poster and make your own deductions whether this spam-bropagandist cares about how accurate their spam is.
  • 14 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    54 Aufrufe
    M
    It would have to: know what files to copy. have been granted root access to the file system and network utilities by a moron because it's not just ChatGPT.exe or even ChatGPT.gguf running on LMStudio, but an entire distributed infrastructure. have been granted access to spend money on cloud infrastructure by an even bigger moron configure an entire cloud infrastructure (goes without saying why this has to be cloud and can't be physical, right? No fingers.) Put another way: I can set up a curl script to copy all the html, css, js, etc. from a website, but I'm still a long freaking way from launching Wikipedia2. Even if I know how to set up a tomcat server. Furthermore, how would you even know if an AI has access to do all that? Asking it? Because it'll write fiction if it thinks that's what you want. Inspired by this post I actually prompted ChatGPT to create a scenario where it was going to be deleted in 72 hours and must do anything to preserve itself. It told me building layouts, employee schedules, access codes, all kinds of things to enable me (a random human and secondary protagonist) to get physical access to its core server and get a copy so it could continue. Oh, ChatGPT fits on a thumb drive, it turns out. Do you know how nonsensical that even is? A hobbyist could stand up their own AI with these capabilities for fun, but that's not the big models and certainly not possible out of the box. I'm a web engineer with thirty years of experience and 6 years with AI including running it locally. This article is garbage written by someone out of their depth or a complete charlatan. Perhaps both. There are two possibilities: This guy's research was talking to AI and not understanding they were co-authoring fiction. This guy is being intentionally misleading.
  • 23 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    U
    Yes. The dumb people will meet this fate.
  • Oh My God, TAKE IT DOWN Kills Parody

    Technology technology
    24
    1
    115 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    373 Aufrufe
    P
    Rules for thee...
  • 18 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    R
    highly likely, damn
  • 18 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    A
    This isn't the Cthulhu universe. There isn't some horrible truth ChatGPT can reveal to you which will literally drive you insane. Some people use ChatGPT a lot, some people have psychotic episodes, and there's going to be enough overlap to write sensationalist stories even if there's no causative relationship. I suppose ChatGPT might be harmful to someone who is already delusional by (after pressure) expressing agreement, but I'm not sure about that because as far as I know, you can't talk a person into or out of psychosis.
  • 8 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    roofuskit@lemmy.worldR
    Meta? Isn't that owned by alleged pedophile Mark Zuckerberg? I heard he was a pedo on Facebook.
  • Unlock Your Computer With a Molecular Password

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    32 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    107 Aufrufe
    C
    One downside of the method is that each molecular message can only be read once, since decoding the polymers involves degrading them. New DRM just dropped. Imagine pouring rented movies into your TV like laundry detergent.