Skip to content

SpaceX's Starship blows up ahead of 10th test flight

Technology
165 110 4.3k
  • Spotify to raise prices in September

    Technology technology
    256
    1
    545 Stimmen
    256 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    sudoer777@lemmy.mlS
    The ones I've noticed so far were somewhere in between metal, hyperpop, and generally chaotic electronic music. Specifically: DEATHWISH by poutyface MONSTER ENERGY GUN! by KevinKempt PIN CUSHION by Siiickbrain Also: Little Game by Benny mi tawa lon pimeja ni There's a bunch of others that I haven't looked through yet. I downloaded a list of songs from my Tidal library with soundiiz so I should do the same with Qobuz then do a diff.
  • OpenAI stops ChatGPT from telling people to break up with partners

    Technology technology
    28
    1
    145 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    123 Aufrufe
    S
    Have a look at relationship subreddits. They are full of people who have been manipulated and gaslit for years or decades who have no idea what is actually normal. For people like that a reality check is really helpful or even vital.
  • 46 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    S
    It really is addictive to ask ChatGPT to answer questions that would annoy another human ... And probably it makes your brain more dependent on trusting an authority.
  • The Internet is for Extremism - by Jeremiah Johnson

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    84 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    129 Aufrufe
    L
    I've been saying this for years. glad someone wrote about it.
  • 16 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 358 Stimmen
    113 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    S
    The problem is the cost of each. Right now material is dirt cheap and energy prices are going up. And we are not good at long term planning.
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    393 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 32 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    82 Aufrufe
    J
    Apparently, it was required to be allowed in that state: Reading a bit more, during the sentencing phase in that state people making victim impact statements can choose their format for expression, and it's entirely allowed to make statements about what other people would say. So the judge didn't actually have grounds to deny it. No jury during that phase, so it's just the judge listening to free form requests in both directions. It's gross, but the rules very much allow the sister to make a statement about what she believes her brother would have wanted to say, in whatever format she wanted. From: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/18471175 influence the sentence From what I've seen, to be fair, judges' decisions have varied wildly regardless, sadly, and sentences should be more standardized. I wonder what it would've been otherwise.