Drug Enforcement Administration agent used Illinois cop’s Flock license plate reader password for immigration enforcement searches
Technology
43
Beiträge
18
Kommentatoren
52
Aufrufe
-
This isn't a good argument.
If law enforcement had access to all of your social media, e-mails and live video feeds from inside your house then they would be able to catch criminals more effectively.
We have laws specifically limiting police powers because we recognize that there are more things to consider than simply maximizing arrests.
Protection against unreasonable search is written into the constitution, after all
If law enforcement had access to all of your social media, e-mails and live video feeds from inside your house then they would be able to catch criminals more effectively.
This isn't the same because law enforcement don't have access to all of your social media already. This is more like if they did but were only allowed to arrest you for you posting a video of you murdering someone, but not for you posting a video of you raping someone.
Protection against unreasonable search is written into the constitution, after all
Your car registration being checked to see who it is registered to and if you have any outstanding warrants etc is not an "unreasonable search".
-
Do you think a person should be seperated from thier families, put into prison, subjected to violence, and sent to a country they've never been to for a misdemeanor?
Because thats a criminal misdemeanor, not civil like immigration. But you dont care do you? You got yours..
Ghoul
Do you think a person should be seperated from thier families
This argument is such a stupid one that is purely made to pull at people's heart strings. If someone commits murder should they not be sent to jail because doing so would "separate them from their family"?
People in the country illegally should be removed from the country. Full stop. They're just deported back to their country of citizenship, unless they're one of the gang members in which case they are going to prison.
-
I'm not responding to you're entire verbal vomit. am going to say this.
What youve written at the end is not what's happening.
What youve written at the end is not what’s happening.
It is though.
-
when ICE has degraded into a largely lawless and authoritarian organization
I think you're mistaking actually enforcing the law as being "lawless and authoritarian".
Now, what I’m a bit confused about is why you are so up-in-arms about the existence of this law instead of the violation of this law.
I'm not so "up in arms" about anything, just questioning why the authorities are handicapped on what they can use one of their systems for. Sure, the violation of the law is bad - but the law itself seems ridiculous. The only people it benefits are literally criminals.
Hmm, why have you not responded to the substantive reasoning for the law? As a self-professed freedom advocate, well, that's obviously a lie so do you actually have something of value to add or are you just trolling?
-
Hmm, why have you not responded to the substantive reasoning for the law? As a self-professed freedom advocate, well, that's obviously a lie so do you actually have something of value to add or are you just trolling?
I have responded - I don’t agree with artificially handicapping what they can use a law enforcement system for. There’s no good reason for the law.
-
I have responded - I don’t agree with artificially handicapping what they can use a law enforcement system for. There’s no good reason for the law.
Would you like to at least engage with the discourse a bit more, eg explain why the reason I have mentioned and other possible reasons are not good to you? Otherwise you're not adding much to the conversation.
-
Would you like to at least engage with the discourse a bit more, eg explain why the reason I have mentioned and other possible reasons are not good to you? Otherwise you're not adding much to the conversation.
eg explain why the reason I have mentioned and other possible reasons are not good to you? Otherwise you’re not adding much to the conversation.
Your reason is ridiculous and wrong, and you're not adding much to the conversation.
As for why this law exists at all, well it’s actually to the benefit of law enforcement: the idea is that immigrant communities are more likely to cooperate with law enforcement if they aren’t scared that they will be the target of immigration control.
Only illegal immigrants are scared of immigration control. Handicapping law enforcement doesn't benefit law enforcement lol.
-
For being illegal immigrants? No they're not lol.
Edit: lol at the reply that you deleted. Unlucky for you I can still see it. They deported an illegal immigrant, and her underage kids went with her. Would you have preferred they separated the kids from the mother? Just leave the 7 year old in the USA alone?
Let me guess, fake news?
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article311666872.html
-
For being illegal immigrants? No they're not lol.
Edit: lol at the reply that you deleted. Unlucky for you I can still see it. They deported an illegal immigrant, and her underage kids went with her. Would you have preferred they separated the kids from the mother? Just leave the 7 year old in the USA alone?
Hard to tell without due process, huh?
Enjoy your day, champ. Hope they don't come after you next.
-
Hard to tell without due process, huh?
Enjoy your day, champ. Hope they don't come after you next.
The illegal immigrant didn’t follow due process when they entered the country illegally, did she?
Due process to remove her was followed and you know it, which is why you deleted the comment with the link.
