Skip to content

YouTube's Latest Update Shows That Online Monoculture Is Dead

Technology
105 77 1
  • On PH today – would love support

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • An AI video ad is making a splash. Is it the future of advertising?

    Technology technology
    2
    10 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    apfelwoischoppen@lemmy.worldA
    Gobble that AI slop NPR. Reads like sponsored content.
  • 28 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    H
    Looks like it hasn't exactly been actively developed since 2022: https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote-App/commits/master/
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    159 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 880 Stimmen
    356 Beiträge
    577 Aufrufe
    communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC
    Is that useful for completing tasks?
  • AI could already be conscious. Are we ready for it?

    Technology technology
    64
    1
    16 Stimmen
    64 Beiträge
    221 Aufrufe
    A
    AI isn't math formulas though. AI is a complex dynamic system reacting to external input. There is no fundamental difference here to a human brain in that regard imo. It's just that the processing isn't happening in biological tissue but in silicon. Is it way less complex than a human? Sure. Is there a fundamental qualitative difference? I don't think so. What's the qualitative difference in your opinion?
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet