Skip to content

YouTube's Latest Update Shows That Online Monoculture Is Dead

Technology
117 80 87
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 10 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    lordgarmadon@lemmy.worldL
    All hail our tiny head terminator overlords.
  • 138 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    152 Aufrufe
    1
    Not our. i talk, and you talk. it is our discussion. It’s a discussion you are trying to have i am not trying to have, i am having it. here you are, replying to me. why are you trying so hard to prove that a discussion is not a discussion? it does not make sense. I labeled as a layman’s guess. yeah. and since i am more knowledgeable than you in this particular regard, i contributed some information you might not have had. now you do and your future layman's guess can be more educated. that is how the discussion works. and for some strange reason, you seem to be pissed about it.
  • 332 Stimmen
    35 Beiträge
    147 Aufrufe
    R
    We have batteries. But yeah, attacking the grid might be smart.
  • The New Digg’s Plan to Use AI for Community Moderation

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    32 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    84 Aufrufe
    L
    trying to be reddit 2.0
  • 175 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    185 Aufrufe
    whotookkarl@lemmy.worldW
    It's not a back door, it's just a rear entryway
  • 105 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    121 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.