Skip to content

YouTube's Latest Update Shows That Online Monoculture Is Dead

Technology
116 79 28
  • Apple Vs The Law

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    40 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    S
    Google is hugely anti competitive. Why cant I use a different voice assistant on android? If I disable the google app Inlose voice control of my car. I get in your example they took their time but they were in the embrace phase.
  • 624 Stimmen
    73 Beiträge
    189 Aufrufe
    swelter_spark@reddthat.comS
    Swappa is good for tech.
  • 894 Stimmen
    134 Beiträge
    548 Aufrufe
    Y
    Yup, but the control mechanisms are going to shit, because it sounds like they are going to maybe do a half assed rollout
  • 366 Stimmen
    27 Beiträge
    133 Aufrufe
    P
    They're like "Wahhh we need to hit 3.5% and then the fascist dictator will totally resign!" and then Trump is like "Oooo my delicate little feefees, oh well, here comes my Gestapo!" while the 50501 protest marshalls chant "We did it! We don't need crushing violence to make a change!" while completely ignoring that the NKD protests accomplished literally nothing.
  • We Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlink

    Technology technology
    496
    1
    1k Stimmen
    496 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    F
    How many of those Saturn V rockets landed themselves back on the launch pad? NASAs milestones were not the same as, nor anywhere near as hard as, SpaceX’s. Your incompetence line shows you’re not capable of being impartial in this so there’s no real point continuing. You’re saying the guy responsible for the EV market we have no, the almost fully self driving cars we have now, the satellite internet network we have now, and the reusable spaceship booster rockets we have now is “incompetent”. You’re not here to actually have a discussion.
  • 33 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    A
    Phew okay /s
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.
  • Data Bill: First They Came for Trans People

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    35 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet