Skip to content

Men are opening up about mental health to AI instead of humans

Technology
324 138 1
  • How to guide for MCP tools, resources, and prompts

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    8 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Authors petition publishers to curtail their use of AI

    Technology technology
    2
    73 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    M
    I’m sure publishers are all ears /s
  • Microsoft’s new genAI model to power agents in Windows 11

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    31 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    ulrich@feddit.orgU
    which one would sell more I mean they would charge a lot of money for the stripped down one because it doesn't allow them to monetize it on the back end, and the vast majority would continue using the resource-slurping ad-riddled one.
  • 52 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    kolanaki@pawb.socialK
    Same. That's probably why I suck ass at math, but my spatial awareness is off the chart. 🫠
  • Study finds persistent spike in hate speech on X

    Technology technology
    43
    1
    348 Stimmen
    43 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    E
    You are a zionist so it's funny that you say that
  • Bill Atkinson, Who Made Computers Easier to Use, Is Dead at 74

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.
  • San Francisco crypto founder faked his own death

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    98 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    S
    My head canon is that Satoshi Nakamoto... ... is Hideo Kojima. Anyway, Satoshi is the pseudonym used on the original... white paper, design doc, whatever it was, for Bitcoin. There's no doubt about that, I was there back before even Mt. Gox became a bitcoin exchange, on the forums discussing it. I thought it was a neat idea, at the time... and then I realized 95% of the discussions on that forum were about 'the ethics of fully informed ponzi schemes' and such, very little devoted to actual technical development... realized this was probably a bad omen.