Skip to content

Elon Musk wants to rewrite "the entire corpus of human knowledge" with Grok

Technology
131 111 0
  • Apple to Australians: You’re Too Stupid to Choose Your Own Apps

    Technology technology
    60
    1
    397 Stimmen
    60 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    P
    I was always surprised by that (t9 dialing). Surely there was some legal reason for that. It felt so - primative.
  • For All That Is Good About Humankind, Ban Smartphones

    Technology technology
    89
    1
    130 Stimmen
    89 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    D
    Appreciated, but do you think the authorities want to win the war on drugs?
  • 479 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    professorchodimaccunt@sh.itjust.worksP
    GOOD lets chance of spAIyware on there
  • 1k Stimmen
    145 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    P
    Not just that. The tax preparation industry has gotten tax more complex and harder to file in the US You get the government you can afford. The tax preparation industry has been able to buy several governments
  • 479 Stimmen
    81 Beiträge
    25 Aufrufe
    douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD
    Did I say that it did? No? Then why the rhetorical question for something that I never stated? Now that we're past that, I'm not sure if I think it's okay, but I at least recognize that it's normalized within society. And has been for like 70+ years now. The problem happens with how the data is used, and particularly abused. If you walk into my store, you expect that I am monitoring you. You expect that you are on camera and that your shopping patterns, like all foot traffic, are probably being analyzed and aggregated. What you buy is tracked, at least in aggregate, by default really, that's just volume tracking and prediction. Suffice to say that broad customer behavior analysis has been a thing for a couple generations now, at least. When you go to a website, why would you think that it is not keeping track of where you go and what you click on in the same manner? Now that I've stated that I do want to say that the real problems that we experience come in with how this data is misused out of what it's scope should be. And that we should have strong regulatory agencies forcing compliance of how this data is used and enforcing the right to privacy for people that want it removed.
  • AI model collapse is not what we paid for

    Technology technology
    20
    1
    84 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    A
    I share your frustration. I went nuts about this the other day. It was in the context of searching on a discord server, rather than Google, but it was so aggravating because of the how the "I know better than you" is everywhere nowadays in tech. The discord server was a reading group, and I was searching for discussion regarding a recent book they'd studied, by someone named "Copi". At first, I didn't use quotation marks, and I found my results were swamped with messages that included the word "copy". At this point I was fairly chill and just added quotation marks to my query to emphasise that it definitely was "Copi" I wanted. I still was swamped with messages with "copy", and it drove me mad because there is literally no way to say "fucking use the terms I give you and not the ones you think I want". The software example you give is a great example of when it would be real great to be able to have this ability. TL;DR: Solidarity in rage
  • 318 Stimmen
    45 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    F
    By giving us the choice of whether someone else should profit by our data. Same as I don't want someone looking over my shoulder and copying off my test answers.
  • 13 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    rinse@lemmy.worldR
    Protocol implementation plebbit-js is separated from client like Seedit