Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation

GitHub is no longer independent at Microsoft after CEO resignation

Technology
205 135 11
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • D

    In China, delivery robots now ride the subway to restock 7-Eleven stores

    Technology technology
    31
    1
    200 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    463 Aufrufe
    C
    I spoke about the country not the people. you cannot deny the fact the capitalist hell that is the US is greedy enough to ruin anything for money.
  • E

    AMD to resume MI308 AI chip exports to China

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    22 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • isaamoonkhgdt_6143@lemmy.zipI

    US AI startups see funding surge while more VC funds struggle to raise, data shows

    Technology technology
    3
    39 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    T
    Vibe investors
  • P

    Doctors are using unapproved AI software to record patient meetings, investigation reveals

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    161 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    102 Aufrufe
    real_squids@sopuli.xyzR
    Why are you using quotations marks? On a serious note, Google's bloat isn't inherent to android, their stuff is added on top as apps and services.
  • gsus4@mander.xyzG

    Cancers can be detected in bloodstream three years prior to diagnosis

    Technology technology
    26
    1
    370 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    313 Aufrufe
    hollownaught@lemmy.worldH
    Bit misleading. Tumour-associated antigens can very easily be detected very early. Problem is, these are only associated with cancer, and provide a very high rate of false positives They're better used as a stepping stone for further testing, or just seeing how advanced a cancer is That is to say, I'm assuming that's what this is about, as i didnt rwad the article. It's the first thing I thought of when I heard "cancer in bloodstream", as the other options tend to be a bit more bleak Edit: they're talking about cancer "shedding genetic material", which I hate how general they're being. Probably talking about proto oncogenes from dead tumour debris, but seems different to what I was expecting
  • alphane_moon@lemmy.worldA

    Apple’s most sweeping software redesign disappoints mainland Chinese consumers

    Technology technology
    47
    1
    99 Stimmen
    47 Beiträge
    717 Aufrufe
    P
    One of the greatest videos ever.
  • exu@feditown.comE

    Broadcom ends business with VMware’s lowest-tier channel partners

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    24 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    S
    Said it the day Broadcom bought them, they're going to squeeze the smaller customers out. This behavior is by design.
  • P

    The European Commission says it is investigating Pornhub, Stripchat, XNXX, and XVideos for potential child safety Digital Services Act (DSA) violations “as a matter of priority”

    Technology technology
    42
    1
    92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    370 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?