Skip to content

Grok, Elon Musk’s AI tool, spreads antisemitic conspiracies: The posts come after changes by Musk, who has previously made similar claims that Jews promote hatred toward white people

Technology
5 5 0
  • Microsoft to Lay Off About 9,000 Employees

    Technology technology
    30
    1
    281 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    85 Aufrufe
    D
    Actually you forgot about data mining or Spyware. Windows has literally become Spyware. I would switch faster than light if anticheat didn't gatekeep Linux. Edit: Microsoft products have literally become Spyware
  • Pornhub is Back in France.

    Technology technology
    33
    1
    311 Stimmen
    33 Beiträge
    127 Aufrufe
    D
    Nordé VPN
  • 429 Stimmen
    102 Beiträge
    57 Aufrufe
    D
    That is bullshit, the economy is created to force you into the labor market. This is just a symptom of capitalism.
  • Fake It Till You Make It? Builder.ai’s $1.5B AI Scam Exposed

    Technology technology
    14
    1
    70 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    44 Aufrufe
    W
    Religion and fiat are always at the top
  • I'm making a guide to Pocket alternatives: getoffpocket.com

    Technology technology
    30
    160 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    112 Aufrufe
    B
    Update: https://lemmy.world/post/31554728
  • 36 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    C
    Definitely don't want to be painting my face every day
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    92 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.
  • Revolutionary cooling technology emerges from Slovenia

    Technology technology
    8
    43 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    S
    You know what's even cheaper to run than this "new technology"? Breathy promotion pieces that give no evidence whatsoever to support it's claims. Way to go, PR folks.