Skip to content

An LAPD helicopter claimed to have ID'ed protesters from above and threatened to "come to your house"

Technology
144 76 76
  • 2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 29 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    I
    That is a drive unit. The robot is bending down next to it wearing a vest.
  • Big Brother Trump Is Watching You

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    86 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • 119 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    25 Aufrufe
    S
    Active ISA would be a disaster. My fairly modern car is unable to reliably detect posted or implied speed limits. Sometimes it overshoots by more than double and sometimes it mandates more than 3/4 slower. The problem is the way it is and will have to be done is by means of optical detection. GPS speed measurement can also be surprisingly unreliable. Especially in underground settings like long pass-unders and tunnels. If the system would be based on something reliable like local wireless communications between speed limit postings it would be a different issue - would also come with a significant risc of abuse though. Also the passive ISA was the first thing I disabled. And I abide by posted speed limits.
  • I am disappointed in the AI discourse

    Technology technology
    27
    7 Stimmen
    27 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    artocode404@lemmy.dbzer0.comA
    I apologize that apparently Lemmy/Reddit people do not have enough self-awareness to accept good criticism, especially if it was just automatically generated and have downloaded that to oblivion. Though I don't really think you should respond to comments with a chatGPT link, not exactly helpful. Comes off a tad bit AI Bro...
  • 50 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    A
    it's an insecurity.
  • 44 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    V
    I use it for my self hosted apps, but yeah, it's rarely useful for websites in the wild.