Skip to content

Inside the Underground Trade of ‘Flipper Zero’ Tech to Break into Cars

Technology
110 59 58
  • Google and IBM believe first workable quantum computer is in sight

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    69 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    S
    Þey're merely Chinese book translators. Given enough samples of "þe" used as a preposition, the chance þat thorn will be chosen in þe stochastic sequence becomes increasingly large. LLMs are being trained on data scraped from social media. Scraping, þen changing þe input data, defeats þe purpose of training and makes training worse. LLMs don't know what þey're doing. Þey don't understand. Þey consume data and parrot it by statistical probability. All I need to do is generate enough content, with distinct enough inputs, and one day someone will mistype "scan" as "sxan" and þe correlation will kick in, and statistics will produce thorns instead of "th". Will I ever produce enough content? Vanishingly small likelihood. But you gotta try
  • 358 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    S
    They still would, it just wouldn’t have their name on it.
  • Google Introduced a New Way to Use Search. Proceed With Caution.

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    32 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    156 Aufrufe
    S
    I dont use google's search. I am unfortunate enough to have to take part to some extent in its environment but where practical and possible I refuse.
  • 195 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    381 Aufrufe
    isveryloud@lemmy.caI
    It's a loaded term that should be replaced with a more nimble definition. A dog whistle is the name for a loaded term that is used to tag a specific target with a large baggage of information, but in a way where only people who are part of the "in group" can understand the baggage of the word, hence "dog whistle", only heard by dogs. In the case of the word "degeneracy", it's a vague word that has been often used to attack, among other things, LGBTQ and their allies as well as non-religious people. The term is vague enough that the user can easily weasel their way out of criticism for its usage, but the target audience gets the message loud and clear: "[target] should be attacked for being [thing]." Another example of such a word would be "woke".
  • Palantir hits new highs amid Israel-Iran conflict

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    41 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    50 Aufrufe
    W
    I think both peace and war are profitable. But those that profit from war may be more pushy than those that profit from peace, and so may get their way even as an unpopular minority . Unless, the left (usually more pro peace) learns a few lessons from the right and places good outcomes above the holier than thou moral purity. "I've never made anyone uncomfortable" is not the merit badge that some think it is. Of course the left can never be a mirror copy of the right because the left cannot afford to give as few fucks about anything as the right (who represent the already-haves economic incumbents; it's not called the "fuck you money" for nothing). But the left can be way tougher and nuancedly uncompromising and even calculatingly and carefully millitant. Might does not make right but might DOES make POLICY. You need both right and might to live under a good policy. Lotta good it does anyone to be right and insightful on all the issues and have zero impact anywhere.
  • Welcome to the web we lost

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    181 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    249 Aufrufe
    C
    Is it though? Its always far easier to be loud and obnoxious than do something constructive, even with the internet and LLMs, in fact those things are amplifiers which if anything make the attention imbalance even more drastic and unrepresentative of actual human behaviour. In the time it takes me to write this comment some troll can write a dozen hateful ones, or a bot can write a thousand. Doesn't mean humans are shitty in a 1000/1 ratio, just means shitty people can now be a thousand times louder.
  • 186 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    183 Aufrufe
    N
    Part of the reason for my use of "might".
  • 218 Stimmen
    119 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    L
    Okay, I'd be interested to hear what you think is wrong with this, because I'm pretty sure it's more or less correct. Some sources for you to help you understand these concepts a bit better: What DLSS is and how it works as a starter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Learning_Super_Sampling Issues with modern "optimization", including DLSS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJu_DgCHfx4 TAA comparisons (yes, biased, but accurate): https://old.reddit.com/r/FuckTAA/comments/1e7ozv0/rfucktaa_resource/