Skip to content

Unless users take action, Android will let Gemini access third-party apps

Technology
86 62 3
  • The Prototype: One Step Closer To Fusion Power

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    115 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    D
    You're forgettinf the simplest reason using Occams Razor. Nuclear energy would have bitten into Oil and Gas. Definitely helped lobby against nuclear power in western countries where companies have as much power as governments.
  • 47 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    67 Aufrufe
    N
    They don't treat their people like shit, they treat them like slaves. In countries outside China at that. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3v5n7w55kpo
  • China's Electric Vehicle Factories Have Become Tourist Hotspots

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    33 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    W
    I'd go to one. I went to Qatar and tried to find out if they did LPG tours. They don't. well at least not easily.
  • 165 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    123 Aufrufe
    M
    I have like a dozen Gmail accounts, and I know plenty of others who do too. Before I owned my own domain, I used the different accounts for different things.
  • The British jet engine that failed in the 'Valley of Death'

    Technology technology
    16
    1
    40 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    64 Aufrufe
    R
    Giving up advancements in science and technology is stagnation. That's not what I'm suggesting. I'm suggesting giving up some particular, potential advancements in science and tecnology, which is a whole different kettle of fish and does not imply stagnation. Thinking it’s a good idea to not do anything until people are fed and housed is stagnation. Why do you think that?
  • 3 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    M
    Are most people in "the west" worse off today than they were 150 years ago? Are there fewer well functioning democracies than there were then? Has no minority group seen any improvement in their freedom? Has there been no improvement in how people interact with each other? No improvement in poverty?
  • 2 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    fisch@discuss.tchncs.deF
    If I went to the USA now, they'd probably put me there after looking at my social media activity anyway
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.