Skip to content

Say Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagate

Technology
134 89 0
  • 14 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    lupusblackfur@lemmy.worldL
    Welp, queue up some more multi-million dollar "donations" to have these cases dropped... Not like the TechBros don't have the funds. ‍️ ‍️
  • 165 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    150 Aufrufe
    M
    I have like a dozen Gmail accounts, and I know plenty of others who do too. Before I owned my own domain, I used the different accounts for different things.
  • uBlockOrigin is porting uBOL to iOS and macOS

    Technology technology
    30
    325 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    138 Aufrufe
    C
    Will never happen unfortunately
  • 24 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    41 Aufrufe
    S
    I think you're missing some key points. Any file hosting service, no matter what, will have to deal with CSAM as long as people are able to upload to it. No matter what. This is an inescapable fact of hosting and the internet in general. Because CSAM is so ubiquitous and constant, one can only do so much to moderate any services, whether they're a large corporation are someone with a server in their closet. All of the larger platforms like 'meta', google, etc., mostly outsource that moderation to workers in developing countries so they don't have to also provide mental health counselling, but that's another story. The reason they own their own hardware is because the hosting services can and will disable your account and take down your servers if there's even a whiff of CSAM. Since it's a constant threat, it's better to own your own hardware and host everything from your closet so you don't have to eat the downtime and wait for some poor bastard in Nigeria to look through your logs and reinstate your account (not sure how that works exactly though).
  • 88 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    109 Aufrufe
    J
    The self hosted model has hard coded censored content.
  • 478 Stimmen
    81 Beiträge
    319 Aufrufe
    douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD
    Did I say that it did? No? Then why the rhetorical question for something that I never stated? Now that we're past that, I'm not sure if I think it's okay, but I at least recognize that it's normalized within society. And has been for like 70+ years now. The problem happens with how the data is used, and particularly abused. If you walk into my store, you expect that I am monitoring you. You expect that you are on camera and that your shopping patterns, like all foot traffic, are probably being analyzed and aggregated. What you buy is tracked, at least in aggregate, by default really, that's just volume tracking and prediction. Suffice to say that broad customer behavior analysis has been a thing for a couple generations now, at least. When you go to a website, why would you think that it is not keeping track of where you go and what you click on in the same manner? Now that I've stated that I do want to say that the real problems that we experience come in with how this data is misused out of what it's scope should be. And that we should have strong regulatory agencies forcing compliance of how this data is used and enforcing the right to privacy for people that want it removed.
  • Microsoft is putting AI actions into the Windows File Explorer

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    1 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    I
    Cool, so that's a specific problem with your needed use case. That's not what you said before.
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet