Skip to content

Say Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagate

Technology
255 155 15
  • 179 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    82 Aufrufe
    N
    Remember curse voice ? I remember
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    165 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 29% of adults couldn't go hour without internet - survey

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    68 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    88 Aufrufe
    saltsong@startrek.websiteS
    Because we don't want them doing surge pricing.
  • Atom-Thin Tech Replaces Silicon in the World’s First 2D Computer

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    125 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    99 Aufrufe
    L
    The 'laptop' is s conceptual illustration. The image shown on the laptop screen is an actual SEM image.
  • 386 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    C
    Melon Usk doomed their FSD efforts from the start with his dunning-kruger-brain take of "humans drive just using their eyes, so cars shouldn't need any sensors besides cameras." Considering how many excellent engineers there are (or were, at least) at his companies, it's kind of fascinating how "stupid at the top" is just as bad, if not worse, than "stupid all the way down."
  • 73 Stimmen
    38 Beiträge
    138 Aufrufe
    F
    For sure they are! Meta more then the others though
  • 18 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    J
    This is why they are businessmen and not politicians or influencers
  • How I use Mastodon in 2025 - fredrocha.net

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    0 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    57 Aufrufe
    J
    Sure. Efficiency isn't everything, though. At the end of the article there are a few people to get you started. Then you can go to your favorites in that list, and follow some of the people THEY are following. Rinse and repeat, follow boosted folks. You'll have 100 souls in no time.