Skip to content

Say Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagate

Technology
260 155 52
  • I was wrong about robots.txt

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    17 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    ineedmana@piefed.zipI
    Huh. So in this case, the file actually is respected. Refreshing
  • 689 Stimmen
    81 Beiträge
    385 Aufrufe
    I
    I don't know why you are getting so many upvotes for being a liar. Tried it on Lemmy.world and it doesn't work. I even tried it with a capital H.
  • 73 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    90 Aufrufe
    W
    ...and it's turned them into the state with the highest standard of living in the US....right?
  • 17 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    T
    Yeah, sure. Like the police need extra help with racial profiling and "probable cause." Fuck this, and fuck the people who think this is a good idea. I'm sure the authoritarians in power right now will get right on those proposed "safeguards," right after they install backdoors into encryption, to which Only They Have The Key, to "protect" everyone from the scary "criminals."
  • The Wikipedia Test

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    85 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    50 Aufrufe
    B
    You act like they want us to have access to information they don't have full control over. I'm pretty sure that's a really low priority for most of them.
  • 137 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    treadful@lemmy.zipT
    https://archive.is/oTR8Q
  • 0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    D
    I don't think accuracy is an issue either. I've been on the web since inception and we always had a terribly inaccurate information landscape. It's really about individual ability to put together found information to an accurate world model and LLMs is a tool just like any other. The real issues imo are effects on society be it information manipulation, breaking our education and workforce systems. But all of that is overshadowed by meme issues like energy use or inaccuracy as these are easy to understand for any person while sociology, politics and macro economics are really hard.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.