Skip to content

Germany deems DeepSeek as illegal content after it is unable to address data security concerns, and asks Apple and Google to block it from their app stores

Technology
46 33 0
  • The Problem with AI War Games

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    21 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    P
    Shall we play a game?
  • Deep Dive on Google's TPU (Tensor Processing Unit)

    Technology technology
    1
    45 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Was ist ChatGPT?

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Claude Exporter: Claude to PDF, MD and more

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 258 Stimmen
    46 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    stzyxh@feddit.orgS
    yea i also were there at a few thousand I think and the content has changed a lot since then.
  • 110 Stimmen
    84 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    T
    It's not new technology you numpty. It's not news. It's not a scientific paper. Wireless energy transfer isn't "bullshit", it's been an understood aspect of physics for a long time. Since you seem unable to grasp the concept, I'll put it in bold and italics: This is a video of a guy doing a DIY project where he wanted to make his setup as wireless as possible. In the video he also goes over his thoughts and design considerations, and explains how the tech works for people who don't already know. It is not new technology. It is not pseudoscience. It is a guy showing off his bespoke PC setup. It does not need an article or a blog post. He can post about it in any form he wants. Personally, I think showcasing this kind of thing in a video is much better than a wall of text. I want to see the process, the finished product, the tools used and how he used them.
  • 51 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldJ
    It is a possibility. Thanks for the input!
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.