Skip to content

The Fitbit Sense line is cooked because it was too good for Google

Technology
3 2 22
  • 41 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    150 Aufrufe
    T
    The poll, published by the research firm and the Walton Family Foundation... Walton Family Foundation provides financial support to The 74. What kind of fool would believe anything from these grifters? Phony AF at its face.
  • On PH today – would love support

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Trump Team Has Full Meltdown Over CNN Story on ICE-Tracking App

    Technology technology
    153
    781 Stimmen
    153 Beiträge
    920 Aufrufe
    N
    Now GrapheneOS the privacy based Android OS is calling them out https://bsky.app/profile/grapheneos.org/post/3lt2prfb2vk2r He really must be thinking just about himself, and not that Apple had the info.
  • Misogyny and Violent Extremism: Can Big Tech Fix the Glitch?

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    20 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    90 Aufrufe
    G
    It is interesting that you are not answering my point... Good work
  • The End of Publishing as We Know It

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    50 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    44 Aufrufe
    beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orgB
    Lol.. I wanted "DRM". But it's been a long day.
  • 53 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    88 Aufrufe
    Z
    What is the technology angle here? What does this have to do with technology?
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    414 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 2 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    F
    IMO stuff like that is why a good trainer is important. IMO it's stronger evidence that proper user-centered design should be done and a usable and intuitive UX and set of APIs developed. But because the buyer of this heap of shit is some C-level, there is no incentive to actually make it usable for the unfortunate peons who are forced to interact with it. See also SFDC and every ERP solution in existence.