Skip to content

Robot performs first realistic surgery without human help: System trained on videos of surgeries performs like an expert surgeon

Technology
94 67 0
  • How the Rubin Observatory Will Reinvent Astronomy

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    53 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    M
    Giant twice-reflecting mirror of low-expansion borrosilicate covered in pure silver and a giant digital camera with filters.
  • time to switch to DeltaChat 😁

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    2 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    engywuck@lemm.eeE
    The point is... (almost) nobody is going to do that. Ask a layman what a SMTP is.
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    123 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Massaging the neck and face may help flush waste out of the brain

    Technology technology
    25
    1
    237 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    113 Aufrufe
    D
    Segue into sexy time
  • Tribo777: Promoções e Recompensas Que Valem a Pena

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 121 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    96 Aufrufe
    A
    It's one of those things where periodically someone gets sanctioned and a few others get scared and stop doing it (or tone it down) for a while. I guess SHEIN are either overdoing it or they crossed the popularity threshold where companies become more scrutinized
  • 172 Stimmen
    71 Beiträge
    255 Aufrufe
    cole@lemdro.idC
    they all burn up, that article does not dispute that