Skip to content

Robot performs first realistic surgery without human help: System trained on videos of surgeries performs like an expert surgeon

Technology
68 54 0
  • The End of Publishing as We Know It

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    51 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.orgB
    Lol.. I wanted "DRM". But it's been a long day.
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    168 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Signal – an ethical replacement for WhatsApp

    Technology technology
    235
    1
    1k Stimmen
    235 Beiträge
    961 Aufrufe
    V
    What I said is that smart people can be convinced to move to another platform. Most of my friends are not technically inclined, but it was easy to make them use it, at least to chat with me. What you did is change "smart people" with "people who already want to move", which is not the same. You then said it's not something you can choose (as you cannot choose to be rich). But I answered that you can actually choose your friends. Never did I say people who are not interested in niche technologies are not smart. My statement can be rephrased in an equivalent statement "people who cannot be convinced to change are not smart", and I stand to it.
  • 2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Let the A.I work or not?

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 10 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • How the US is turning into a mass techno-surveillance state

    Technology technology
    66
    1
    484 Stimmen
    66 Beiträge
    238 Aufrufe
    D
    Are these people retarded? Did they forget Edward Snowden?
  • Microsoft wants Windows Update to handle all apps

    Technology technology
    45
    1
    61 Stimmen
    45 Beiträge
    161 Aufrufe
    N
    the package managers for linux that i know of are great because you can easily control everything they do