Skip to content

On July 7, Gemini AI will access your WhatsApp and more. Learn how to disable it on Android.

Technology
94 64 4
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    85 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Trump social media site brought down by Iran hackers

    Technology technology
    174
    1k Stimmen
    174 Beiträge
    311 Aufrufe
    B
    That's the spirit
  • How can websites verify unique (IRL) identities?

    Technology technology
    6
    8 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    H
    Safe, yeah. Private, no. If you want to verify whether a user is a real person, you need very personally identifiable information. That’s not ever going to be private. The best you could do, in theory, is have a government service that takes that PII and gives the user a signed cryptographic certificate they can use to verify their identity. Most people would either lose their private key or have it stolen, so even that system would have problems. The closest to reality you could do right now is use Apple’s FaceID, and that’s anything but private. Pretty safe though. It’s super illegal and quite hard to steal someone’s face.
  • Your TV Is Spying On You

    Technology technology
    122
    1
    419 Stimmen
    122 Beiträge
    288 Aufrufe
    D
    Still gonna need a large screen somehow unless you watch all your stuff at the desk or through a laptop.
  • IRS tax filing software released to the people as free software

    Technology technology
    14
    288 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    P
    Only if you're a scumbag/useful idiot.
  • 215 Stimmen
    118 Beiträge
    75 Aufrufe
    A
    Outlook has search?!
  • 0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    D
    I don't think accuracy is an issue either. I've been on the web since inception and we always had a terribly inaccurate information landscape. It's really about individual ability to put together found information to an accurate world model and LLMs is a tool just like any other. The real issues imo are effects on society be it information manipulation, breaking our education and workforce systems. But all of that is overshadowed by meme issues like energy use or inaccuracy as these are easy to understand for any person while sociology, politics and macro economics are really hard.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet