Skip to content

YouTube is getting rid of its Trending page and Trending Now list

Technology
49 41 0
  • 737 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • The Really Dark Truth About Bots

    Technology technology
    5
    84 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    plutoniumacid@lemmy.worldP
    "Engineers" a.k.a. uneducated cubicle slaves
  • Biotech uses fermentation to produce milk proteins without cows

    Technology technology
    26
    199 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    125 Aufrufe
    M
    Alpro Not Milk comes pretty close for me, oat drink.
  • You probably don't remember these but I have a question

    Technology technology
    52
    2
    96 Stimmen
    52 Beiträge
    180 Aufrufe
    lordwiggle@lemmy.worldL
    Priorities man, priorities
  • YouTube tops Disney and Netflix in TV viewing

    Technology technology
    96
    1
    215 Stimmen
    96 Beiträge
    306 Aufrufe
    C
    "Not Interested" is just free data for them to fill out your account's advertising profile.
  • 51 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldJ
    It is a possibility. Thanks for the input!
  • AI could already be conscious. Are we ready for it?

    Technology technology
    64
    1
    16 Stimmen
    64 Beiträge
    191 Aufrufe
    A
    AI isn't math formulas though. AI is a complex dynamic system reacting to external input. There is no fundamental difference here to a human brain in that regard imo. It's just that the processing isn't happening in biological tissue but in silicon. Is it way less complex than a human? Sure. Is there a fundamental qualitative difference? I don't think so. What's the qualitative difference in your opinion?
  • 5 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    B
    Oh sorry, my mind must have been a bit foggy when I read that. We agree 100%