Skip to content

Trump social media site brought down by Iran hackers

Technology
174 112 739
  • 223 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    X
    They didn't ask what the comic was, they asked "but why not both?". It can be both unethical and a lesson
  • French city of Lyon ditching Microsoft for FOSS

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    494 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    76 Aufrufe
    K
    The important thing is that the doomsday device runs Linux
  • How can websites verify unique (IRL) identities?

    Technology technology
    6
    8 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    H
    Safe, yeah. Private, no. If you want to verify whether a user is a real person, you need very personally identifiable information. That’s not ever going to be private. The best you could do, in theory, is have a government service that takes that PII and gives the user a signed cryptographic certificate they can use to verify their identity. Most people would either lose their private key or have it stolen, so even that system would have problems. The closest to reality you could do right now is use Apple’s FaceID, and that’s anything but private. Pretty safe though. It’s super illegal and quite hard to steal someone’s face.
  • Army gives shady offer to tech bros so they can play soldier

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    96 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    62 Aufrufe
    P
    It is common in the military to give commissioned rank to certain positions for the higher pay grade. The fast tracking takes away from the belief everyone serving with you went through (roughly) the same basic training as you.
  • A receipt printer cured my procrastination [ADHD]

    Technology technology
    21
    1
    120 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    109 Aufrufe
    cygnosis@lemmy.worldC
    Good to know. Also an easy problem to fix. Just use phenol free paper.
  • 131 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    P
    This is a tough one for me: I'm opposed to femicide, but I only wish the absolute worst on influencers.
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    346 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 11 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    69 Aufrufe
    E
    No, just laminated ones. Closed at one end. Easy enough to make or buy. You can even improvise the propellant.