Skip to content

Microsoft exec admits it 'cannot guarantee' data sovereignty

Technology
19 14 82
  • Lemmy has a problem

    Technology technology
    35
    2
    49 Stimmen
    35 Beiträge
    135 Aufrufe
    B
    Say it loud
  • Tough, Tiny, and Totally Repairable: Inside the Framework 12

    Technology technology
    109
    1
    548 Stimmen
    109 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    P
    What? No, the framework 12 is the thing the had before the 13 one. Nowadays, they call that model always 13 it seems. I think you're confusing something, I've got mine since a few years now.
  • Mudita Kompakt

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    62 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    89 Aufrufe
    anunusualrelic@lemmy.worldA
    There you go then. It's 80 €.
  • 781 Stimmen
    231 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    D
    Haha I'm kidding, it's good that you share your solution here.
  • Open Source CAD In The Browser

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    154 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    96 Aufrufe
    xavier666@lemm.eeX
    Electron: Heyyyyyyy
  • 11 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • lemm.ee is shutting down at the end of this month

    Technology technology
    130
    625 Stimmen
    130 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    vopyr@lemmy.worldV
    If I know correctly, it is not possible to export posts, comments, replies.
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    124 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.