Skip to content

Your household smart products must respect your privacy – including your air fryer

Technology
20 13 0
  • 32 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    L
    Most features here let Google scan and evaluate what you do on the web, messages, and apps. They say it helps security, but of course it assures those features are on letting them suck in more data about the person. A company like Google doesn't do something out of the kindness of their hearts, they do it for profit
  • 29% of adults couldn't go hour without internet - survey

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    66 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    I
    *Chooses "no, I don't respond to surveys"*
  • 325 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    Good. Anyone who uses shit like this deserves all of the bad things that go along with it. Stupidity will continue to be punished.
  • Stepping outside the algorithm

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    19 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 472 Stimmen
    99 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    J
    Copyright law is messy. Thank you for the elaboration.
  • Why Japan's animation industry has embraced AI

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    1 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    R
    The genre itself has become neutered, too. A lot of anime series have the usual "anime elements" and a couple custom ideas. And similar style, too glossy for my taste. OK, what I think is old and boring libertarian stuff, I'll still spell it out. The reason people are having such problems is because groups and businesses are de facto legally enshrined in their fields, it's almost like feudal Europe's system of privileges and treaties. At some point I thought this is good, I hope no evil god decided to fulfill my wish. There's no movement, and a faction (like Disney with Star Wars) that buys a place (a brand) can make any garbage, and people will still try to find the depth in it and justify it (that complaint has been made about Star Wars prequels, but no, they are full of garbage AND have consistent arcs, goals and ideas, which is why they revitalized the Expanded Universe for almost a decade, despite Lucas-<companies> having sort of an internal social collapse in year 2005 right after Revenge of the Sith being premiered ; I love the prequels, despite all the pretense and cringe, but their verbal parts are almost fillers, their cinematographic language and matching music are flawless, the dialogue just disrupts it all while not adding much, - I think Lucas should have been more decisive, a bit like Tartakovsky with the Clone Wars cartoon, just more serious, because non-verbal doesn't equal stupid). OK, my thought wandered away. Why were the legal means they use to keep such positions created? To make the economy nicer to the majority, to writers, to actors, to producers. Do they still fulfill that role? When keeping monopolies, even producing garbage or, lately, AI slop, - no. Do we know a solution? Not yet, because pressing for deregulation means the opponent doing a judo movement and using that energy for deregulating the way everything becomes worse. Is that solution in minimizing and rebuilding the system? I believe still yes, nothing is perfect, so everything should be easy to quickly replace, because errors and mistakes plaguing future generations will inevitably continue to be made. The laws of the 60s were simple enough for that in most countries. The current laws are not. So the general direction to be taken is still libertarian. Is this text useful? Of course not. I just think that in the feudal Europe metaphor I'd want to be a Hussite or a Cossack or at worst a Venetian trader.
  • 533 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    ulrich@feddit.orgU
    If you want a narrative, look at all the full-price $250k Roadster pre-orders they've been holding onto for like 8 years now with zero signs of production and complete silence for the last...5 years?
  • 0 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    P
    I applaud this, but I still say it's not far enough. Adjusted, the amount might match, but 121.000 is still easier to cough up for a billionaire than 50 is for a single mother of two who can barely make ends meet