Skip to content

Trump Mobile launches $47 service and a gold phone

Technology
128 103 0
  • getoffpocket.com, my guide to Pocket alternatives, just got a redesign

    Technology technology
    12
    56 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    Very attractive page. I'll check it out more when I have some free time. Fwiw, I went from Pocket to Wallabag. Still too new to comment on how the two compare. Import to Wallabag appears to have been a completely smooth transition (once I regained access to my Pocket account). This was when exporting from Pocket and importing to Wallabag. Trying to do it with the Pocket APIs failed every time.
  • 626 Stimmen
    75 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    theyll only stop selling politicians and block that
  • The Trump Mobile T1 Phone looks both bad and impossible

    Technology technology
    42
    1
    139 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    "Components" means in this case the phone and the sticker.
  • 347 Stimmen
    91 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    E
    It kinda seems like you don’t understand the actual technology.
  • Napster/BitTorrent for machine learning?

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    27 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    G
    What would a use case look like? I assume that the latency will make it impractical to train something that's LLM-sized. But even for something small, wouldn't a data center be more efficient?
  • 6 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    T
    Oh I agree. I just think is part of the equation perhaps the thinner and lighter will enable for better processor? Not an AR guy , although I lived my oculus until FB got hold of it. Didn't use it ever again after that day.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    O
    I feel like I'm in those years of You really want a 3d TV, right? Right? 3D is what you've been waiting for, right? all over again, but with a different technology. It will be VR's turn again next. I admit I'm really rooting for affordable, real-world, daily-use AR though.