Skip to content

The Prime Reasons to Avoid Amazon

Technology
76 58 0
  • Google kills the fact-checking snippet

    Technology technology
    13
    150 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    45 Aufrufe
    L
    Remember when that useless bot was around here, objectively wrong, and getting downvoted all the time? Good times.
  • Converting An E-Paper Photo Frame Into Weather Map

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    113 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    indibrony@lemmy.worldI
    Looks like East Anglia has basically disappeared. At least nothing of value was lost
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 29% of adults couldn't go hour without internet - survey

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    68 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    60 Aufrufe
    saltsong@startrek.websiteS
    Because we don't want them doing surge pricing.
  • 353 Stimmen
    40 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    L
    If AI constantly refined its own output, sure, unless it hits a wall eventually or starts spewing bullshit because of some quirk of training. But I doubt it could learn to summarise better without external input, just like a compiler won't produce a more optimised version of itself without human development work.
  • The weaponization of Waymo

    Technology technology
    26
    1
    148 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    F
    Not a warzone. A protest. A protest where over twice as many reporters have been assaulted and/or shot than waymo cars have burned.
  • 1 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    L
    Where and what is texas?