Skip to content

Peter Thiel’s protégés: a common thread runs through Trump’s tech team

Technology
5 4 66
  • 212 Stimmen
    55 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    A
    Looks like it does, at least in "private spaces" https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-632.html (I'm assuming that CA means California and not Canada)
  • 153 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksP
    What you can do Data Rescue project-https://www.datarescueproject.org/faq/ Public Environmental Data Partners https://screening-tools.com/ Data Index https://dataindex.us/ The Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/sites/icpsr/find-data/working-together/thematic-collections
  • 423 Stimmen
    78 Beiträge
    372 Aufrufe
    S
    https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/linuxandopensourceblog/announcing-availability-of-almalinux-as-an-endorsed-linux-distribution-in-azure/4282201 Linux has become the most popular operating system on Azure as over 60% of customer cores run Linux-based workloads. Even on Microsoft Azure they mostly use Linux Maybe windows still underpins some important services for them though, I can't really comment on that
  • 27 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    P
    I doubt it. They just think others do.
  • 548 Stimmen
    102 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    lechekaflan@lemmy.worldL
    Not surprising it's already ahead, as about 20 years ago they offered 100mbps to anyone who could pay for it (a certain Danny Choo comes to mind).
  • Create a Professional Logo with AI – Step-by-Step Digital Guide

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 18 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • CrowdStrike Announces Layoffs Affecting 500 Employees

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    242 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    80 Aufrufe
    S
    This is where the magic of near meaningless corpo-babble comes in. The layoffs are part of a plan to aspirationally acheive the goal of $10b revenue by EoY 2025. What they are actually doing is a significant restructuring of the company, refocusing by outside hiring some amount of new people to lead or be a part of departments or positions that haven't existed before, or are being refocused to other priorities... ... But this process also involves laying off 500 of the 'least productive' or 'least mission critical' employees. So, technically, they can, and are, arguing that their new organizational paradigm will be so succesful that it actually will result in increased revenue, not just lower expenses. Generally corpos call this something like 'right-sizing' or 'refocusing' or something like that. ... But of course... anyone with any actual experience with working at a place that does this... will tell you roughly this is what happens: Turns out all those 'grunts' you let go of, well they actually do a lot more work in a bunch of weird, esoteric, bandaid solutions to keep everything going, than upper management was aware of... because middle management doesn't acknowledge or often even understand that that work was being done, because they are generally self-aggrandizing narcissist petty tyrants who spend more time in meetings fluffing themselves up than actually doing any useful management. Then, also, you are now bringing on new, outside people who look great on paper, to lead new or modified apartments... but they of course also do not have any institutional knowledge, as they are new. So now, you have a whole bunch of undocumented work that was being done, processes which were being followed... which is no longer being done, which is not documented.... and the new guys, even if they have the best intentions, now have to spend a quarter or two or three figuring out just exactly how much pre-existing middle management has been bullshitting about, figuring out just how much things do not actually function as they ssid it did... So now your efficiency improving restructuring is actually a chaotic mess. ... Now, this 'right sizing' is not always apocalyptically extremely bad, but it is also essentially never totally free from hiccups... and it increases stress, workload, and tensions between basically everyone at the company, to some extent. Here's Forbes explanation of this phenomenon, if you prefer an explanation of right sizing in corpospeak: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/rightsizing/