Skip to content

Samsung phones can survive twice as many charges as Pixel and iPhone, according to EU data

Technology
119 82 1
  • 350 Stimmen
    72 Beiträge
    79 Aufrufe
    M
    Sure, the internet is more practical, and the odds of being caught in the time required to execute a decent strike plan, even one as vague as: "we're going to Amerika and we're going to hit 50 high profile targets on July 4th, one in every state" (Dear NSA analyst, this is entirely hypothetical) so your agents spread to the field and start assessing from the ground the highest impact targets attainable with their resources, extensive back and forth from the field to central command daily for 90 days of prep, but it's being carried out on 270 different active social media channels as innocuous looking photo exchanges with 540 pre-arranged algorithms hiding the messages in the noise of the image bits. Chances of security agencies picking this up from the communication itself? About 100x less than them noticing 50 teams of activists deployed to 50 states at roughly the same time, even if they never communicate anything. HF (more often called shortwave) is well suited for the numbers game. A deep cover agent lying in wait, potentially for years. Only "tell" is their odd habit of listening to the radio most nights. All they're waiting for is a binary message: if you hear the sequence 3 17 22 you are to make contact for further instructions. That message may come at any time, or may not come for a decade. These days, you would make your contact for further instructions via internet, and sure, it would be more practical to hide the "make contact" signal in the internet too, but shortwave is a longstanding tech with known operating parameters.
  • Blocking real-world ads: is the future here?

    Technology technology
    33
    1
    198 Stimmen
    33 Beiträge
    91 Aufrufe
    S
    Also a work of fiction
  • YouTube is getting more AI.

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    38 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    E
    Yaaaaay! Said no one.
  • 254 Stimmen
    143 Beiträge
    282 Aufrufe
    S
    Why would every American buy one if they can't afford insurance + medical bills to pay for health care? "Oh look, I'm having a heart attack. Good to know. Guess I'll just keep working."
  • 112 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    exec@pawb.socialE
    I mean no more live view via the screen
  • 92 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    woelkchen@lemmy.worldW
    Telegram isn't banned in Ukraine. Can't be that bad.
  • Is Internet Content Too Engaging?

    Technology technology
    3
    5 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    T
    The number of tabs I have open from sites I’ve clicked on, started reading, said “eh, I’ll get back to this later” and never have, says no.
  • Dyson Has Killed Its Bizarre Zone Air-Purifying Headphones

    Technology technology
    45
    1
    227 Stimmen
    45 Beiträge
    100 Aufrufe
    rob_t_firefly@lemmy.worldR
    I have been chuckling like a dork at this particular patent since such things first became searchable online, and have never found any evidence of it being manufactured and marketed at all. The "non-adhesive adherence" is illustrated in the diagrams on the patent which you can see at the link. The inventor proposes "a facing of fluffy fibrous material" to provide the filtration and the adherence; basically this thing is the softer side of a velcro strip, bent in half with the fluff facing outward so it sticks to the inside of your buttcrack to hold itself in place in front of your anus and filter your farts through it.