Skip to content

Samsung phones can survive twice as many charges as Pixel and iPhone, according to EU data

Technology
98 69 0
  • New Google AdSense Fill Empty In-Page Ads

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    21 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    S
    I've not seen an ad in years, so they can try to monetize me but will fail spectacularly
  • 21 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    B
    The AI only needs to alert the doctor that something is off and should be tested for. It does not replace doctors, but augments them. It's actually a great use for AI, it's just not what we think of as AI in a post-LLM world. The medically useful AI is pattern recognition. LLMs may also help doctors if they need a starting point into researching something weird and obscure, but ChatGPT isn't being used for diagnosing patients, nor is anything any AI says the "final verdict". It's just a tool to improve early detection of disorders, or it might point someone towards an useful article or book.
  • Telegram, the FSB, and the Man in the Middle

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    52 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    R
    You can be seen from a kilometer away, pots ))
  • Matrix is cooked

    Technology technology
    29
    1
    153 Stimmen
    29 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    jadedblueeyes@programming.devJ
    The Matrix Foundation and Element/New Vector are different orgs, and it's Element with the government contracts
  • Tech Company Recruiters Sidestep Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    104 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 182 Stimmen
    39 Beiträge
    80 Aufrufe
    H
    https://archive.org/details/swgrap
  • 30 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    S
    The thing about compelling lies is not that they are new, just that they are easier to expand. The most common effect of compelling lies is their ability to get well-intentioned people to support malign causes and give their money to fraudsters. So, expect that to expand, kind of like it already has been. The big question for me is what the response will be. Will we make lying illegal? Will we become a world of ever more paranoid isolationists, returning to clans, families, households, as the largest social group you can trust? Will most people even have the intelligence to see what is happenning and respond? Or will most people be turned into info-puppets, controlled into behaviours by manipulation of their information diet to an unprecedented degree? I don't know.