Skip to content

Japan using generative AI less than other countries

Technology
94 54 36
  • Grok's Hate Speech Meltdown Exposes AI's Hidden Bias Crisis

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    134 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    samskara@sh.itjust.worksS
    How observant and insightful of you.
  • 205 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    203 Aufrufe
    realitista@lemmy.worldR
    The prevalence of Nazis among founders of car makers historically is definitely worth noting. With both Ford and Musk as Nazi sympathizers, it's a definite majority in the USA.
  • OpenAI's $210K Residency Program Tackles AI Talent Shortage

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    7 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    R
    Why don’t they use AI to replace human AI developers?
  • US Senate strikes AI regulation ban from Trump megabill

    Technology technology
    3
    73 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    C
    No one likes little teddy, it appears.
  • Websites Are Tracking You Via Browser Fingerprinting

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    296 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    173 Aufrufe
    M
    Lets you question how digital stalking is still allowed?
  • The U.S. Immigration and Customs

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 182 Stimmen
    39 Beiträge
    171 Aufrufe
    H
    https://archive.org/details/swgrap
  • AI cheating surge pushes schools into chaos

    Technology technology
    25
    45 Stimmen
    25 Beiträge
    123 Aufrufe
    C
    Sorry for the late reply, I had to sit and think on this one for a little bit. I think there are would be a few things going on when it comes to designing a course to teach critical thinking, nuances, and originality; and they each have their own requirements. For critical thinking: The main goal is to provide students with a toolbelt for solving various problems. Then instilling the habit of always asking "does this match the expected outcome? What was I expecting?". So usually courses will be setup so students learn about a tool, practice using the tool, then have a culminating assignment on using all the tools. Ideally, the problems students face at the end require multiple tools to solve. Nuance mainly naturally comes with exposure to the material from a professional - The way a mechanical engineer may describe building a desk will probably differ greatly compared to a fantasy author. You can also explain definitions and industry standards; but thats really dry. So I try to teach nuances via definitions by mixing in the weird nuances as much as possible with jokes. Then for originality; I've realized I dont actually look for an original idea; but something creative. In a classroom setting, you're usually learning new things about a subject so a student's knowledge of that space is usually very limited. Thus, an idea that they've never heard about may be original to them, but common for an industry expert. For teaching originality creativity, I usually provide time to be creative & think, and provide open ended questions as prompts to explore ideas. My courses that require originality usually have it as a part of the culminating assignment at the end where they can apply their knowledge. I'll also add in time where students can come to me with preliminary ideas and I can provide feedback on whether or not it passes the creative threshold. Not all ideas are original, but I sometimes give a bit of slack if its creative enough. The amount of course overhauling to get around AI really depends on the material being taught. For example, in programming - you teach critical thinking by always testing your code, even with parameters that don't make sense. For example: Try to add 123 + "skibbidy", and see what the program does.