Skip to content

Windows 11 will soon be able to describe images on your screen using AI — and it'll all be done locally

Technology
25 22 1
  • 126 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    R
    In propaganda, the main thing is not to confuse militants with insurgents.
  • Microsoft finally bids farewell to PowerShell 2.0

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    69 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    51 Aufrufe
    B
    Batch scripts run on my locked-down work laptop. Powershell requires administrator privileges that I don't have. I don't make the rules, I just evade them
  • OpenAI's $210K Residency Program Tackles AI Talent Shortage

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    7 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    R
    Why don’t they use AI to replace human AI developers?
  • Session Messenger

    Technology technology
    8
    2
    15 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    55 Aufrufe
    S
    I think it was a great idea, but poorly executed. I prefer using simpleX, personally.
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    59
    321 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    298 Aufrufe
    I
    Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy imagine you’re a YouTuber and want to accept donations: that will force you to give out your name to them, which they could use to get your address and phone number. There’s always someone that hates you, and I rather not have them knowing my personal info Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto if you’re the seller then it’s a lot better. With the traditional banking system, with enough knowledge you can cheat both sides: stolen cards, abusive chargebacks, bank accounts in other countries under fake name/fake ID… Crypto simplifies scamming when the seller, and pretty much makes it impossible for buyers What specifically are you boycotting? Card payments, international tranfers, national transfers taking days to complete, money being seizable at all times many banks lose money on them Their plans are basically all focused on the card you get. Pretty sure they make money with it, else many wouldn’t offer cash back (selling infos and getting a fee from card payments?) if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. Banks are evil anyways, does it really change anything? The difference is that it technically helps everyone using crypto, not only the rich. Plus P2P exchanges are a thing You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less That’s just factually false. Do you know the price of a swift transfer? Now compare it to crypto tx fees, with many being under $0.01
  • 16 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    R
    Even with pirated Spotify the worsening of recommendations pushed me to pirate another service. Which is a win for Spotify, I guess.
  • 7 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    54 Aufrufe
    V
    Ah yeah, that doesn't look like my cup of tea.
  • 0 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    43 Aufrufe
    kolanaki@pawb.socialK
    I kinda don't want anyone other than a doctor determining it, tbh. Fuck the human bean counters just as much as the AI ones. Hopefully we can just start growing organs instead of having to even make such a grim decision and everyone can get new livers. Even if they don't need them.