Skip to content

lemm.ee is shutting down at the end of this month

Technology
130 75 3.3k
  • 255 Stimmen
    47 Beiträge
    116 Aufrufe
    D
    Liberals love nationalism
  • Elon Musk's X slams French criminal investigation

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    51 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    141 Aufrufe
    B
    Actually there was just yesterday a story about Corning (The maker of Gorilla glass), that was accused by EU for anti competitive behavior, where Corning entered in positive dialogue, and stated they intended to work fully within regulation. https://lemmy.world/post/33255689 Corning, the US-based manufacturer of Gorilla Glass, has successfully avoided potential European Union antitrust fines of up to $1.25 billion by agreeing to a set of legally binding commitments that address concerns over its exclusive supply agreements for specialty glass used in smartphones and other handheld devices. So yes Musk is an ass, also compared to other companies. And his reaction is confrontational, which is not normal behavior.
  • Microsoft Soars as AI Cloud Boom Drives $595 Price Target

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    7 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    isaamoonkhgdt_6143@lemmy.zipI
    I wonder if Microsoft will do a stock split in the future?
  • TikTok Is Reportedly Making a U.S. Version of the App

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    28 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    95 Aufrufe
    abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zoneA
    So basically doing what Western Tech companies do in China? Just sounds like a way to isolate American users and control what they see and hear...a bit like what they do in China...huh.
  • 90 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    204 Aufrufe
    W
    At least with AI it's easy to see how shitty it gets as the codebase grows working on even a toy project over a week. Then again, if you have no frame of reference maybe that doesn't feel as awful as it should.
  • In Militarizing Push, Russian School Children To Build Drones

    Technology technology
    37
    1
    263 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    511 Aufrufe
    Z
    https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque
  • 237 Stimmen
    54 Beiträge
    524 Aufrufe
    P
    I was so confused when I saw your comment until I reread my own. It really is top notch technology I guess!
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    79 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.