Skip to content

Why does Apple make a minority of developers finance the entire App Store?

Technology
10 9 93
  • yawn
    Delete the Apple App Store and install a third party replacement, the way god/EU Intended.

  • yawn
    Delete the Apple App Store and install a third party replacement, the way god/EU Intended.

    See I bet you think that would make things better, don’t you?

    It won’t. It will make them so much worse.

    Unless the EU (government) runs it, you’re going to get the world’s shadiest App Store or Sores possible.

    “Just don’t use the shady ones then.”

    That’s great until:

    1. It’s your SO or kid accessing it and they don’t know any better.
    2. You just bought something (an appliance, a vehicle, an FPV drone, whatever) and it requires you to use an app, and that app is an exclusive on the shadiest App Store possible.

    “That doesn’t happen on android!”

    It will absolutely happen with Apple, because there’s so much money that will be up for grabs.

    I hope you like signing up with all your personal data and credit card information on app stores that make Apple look like saints, because that’s where this is headed, and sadly you’ll drag me with you.

    Because again this hypothetical thing you bought might be a family member buying it, so it won’t even be up to you at that point.

    This is what I see happening in the future.

    The way to avoid it is to get rid of app stores completely, and have users download and install apps one by one. Like that’s going to happen.

  • See I bet you think that would make things better, don’t you?

    It won’t. It will make them so much worse.

    Unless the EU (government) runs it, you’re going to get the world’s shadiest App Store or Sores possible.

    “Just don’t use the shady ones then.”

    That’s great until:

    1. It’s your SO or kid accessing it and they don’t know any better.
    2. You just bought something (an appliance, a vehicle, an FPV drone, whatever) and it requires you to use an app, and that app is an exclusive on the shadiest App Store possible.

    “That doesn’t happen on android!”

    It will absolutely happen with Apple, because there’s so much money that will be up for grabs.

    I hope you like signing up with all your personal data and credit card information on app stores that make Apple look like saints, because that’s where this is headed, and sadly you’ll drag me with you.

    Because again this hypothetical thing you bought might be a family member buying it, so it won’t even be up to you at that point.

    This is what I see happening in the future.

    The way to avoid it is to get rid of app stores completely, and have users download and install apps one by one. Like that’s going to happen.

    Lmao, this is hysterical nonsense.

    Hey everyone on Windows, is your machine filled with thousands of shady app stores because you have the ability to install Steam? No? What a shocker! Who could have predicted!

  • I thought that you had to pay a fee every year, even for free apps. Something around 100$. Compared to a website, I think that for hosting a static file in a CDN it's already pretty expensive for most free apps developers.

  • See I bet you think that would make things better, don’t you?

    It won’t. It will make them so much worse.

    Unless the EU (government) runs it, you’re going to get the world’s shadiest App Store or Sores possible.

    “Just don’t use the shady ones then.”

    That’s great until:

    1. It’s your SO or kid accessing it and they don’t know any better.
    2. You just bought something (an appliance, a vehicle, an FPV drone, whatever) and it requires you to use an app, and that app is an exclusive on the shadiest App Store possible.

    “That doesn’t happen on android!”

    It will absolutely happen with Apple, because there’s so much money that will be up for grabs.

    I hope you like signing up with all your personal data and credit card information on app stores that make Apple look like saints, because that’s where this is headed, and sadly you’ll drag me with you.

    Because again this hypothetical thing you bought might be a family member buying it, so it won’t even be up to you at that point.

    This is what I see happening in the future.

    The way to avoid it is to get rid of app stores completely, and have users download and install apps one by one. Like that’s going to happen.

    Or you can just use f-droid and research in advance if the application you need is on on f-droid and let that influence your purchasing decisions.

  • See I bet you think that would make things better, don’t you?

    It won’t. It will make them so much worse.

    Unless the EU (government) runs it, you’re going to get the world’s shadiest App Store or Sores possible.

    “Just don’t use the shady ones then.”

    That’s great until:

    1. It’s your SO or kid accessing it and they don’t know any better.
    2. You just bought something (an appliance, a vehicle, an FPV drone, whatever) and it requires you to use an app, and that app is an exclusive on the shadiest App Store possible.

    “That doesn’t happen on android!”

    It will absolutely happen with Apple, because there’s so much money that will be up for grabs.

    I hope you like signing up with all your personal data and credit card information on app stores that make Apple look like saints, because that’s where this is headed, and sadly you’ll drag me with you.

    Because again this hypothetical thing you bought might be a family member buying it, so it won’t even be up to you at that point.

    This is what I see happening in the future.

    The way to avoid it is to get rid of app stores completely, and have users download and install apps one by one. Like that’s going to happen.

    “That doesn’t happen on android!”

    It will absolutely happen with Apple, because there’s so much money that will be up for grabs.

    Yeah sure because there are no expensive Android phones.

  • “That doesn’t happen on android!”

    It will absolutely happen with Apple, because there’s so much money that will be up for grabs.

    Yeah sure because there are no expensive Android phones.

  • See I bet you think that would make things better, don’t you?

    It won’t. It will make them so much worse.

    Unless the EU (government) runs it, you’re going to get the world’s shadiest App Store or Sores possible.

    “Just don’t use the shady ones then.”

    That’s great until:

    1. It’s your SO or kid accessing it and they don’t know any better.
    2. You just bought something (an appliance, a vehicle, an FPV drone, whatever) and it requires you to use an app, and that app is an exclusive on the shadiest App Store possible.

    “That doesn’t happen on android!”

    It will absolutely happen with Apple, because there’s so much money that will be up for grabs.

    I hope you like signing up with all your personal data and credit card information on app stores that make Apple look like saints, because that’s where this is headed, and sadly you’ll drag me with you.

    Because again this hypothetical thing you bought might be a family member buying it, so it won’t even be up to you at that point.

    This is what I see happening in the future.

    The way to avoid it is to get rid of app stores completely, and have users download and install apps one by one. Like that’s going to happen.

    I use F-Droid on Android and I don't use Google Play at all. I'm really glad laws exist that prevent monopolization and I'm really glad the OS is open source so that if it were to ever change I will just use a different fork.

    There's no sign up or payment info required.

    It works great for me. I don't pay for any apps nor have I ever nor will I, but if I did, I would PayPal/Ko-Fi/Shopify/Patreon the money to the Dev without any further sign up required.

    1. It’s your SO or kid accessing it and they don’t know any better.

    Teach them or dont give them devices or admin privs on them. If all else fails they are free to use the apple app store where apple will now be exposed to the broader market and set the fees accordingly.

    1. You just bought something (an appliance, a vehicle, an FPV drone, whatever) and it requires you to use an app, and that app is an exclusive on the shadiest App Store possible.

    I would never buy such junk that it requires an app. Your decisions are your own.

    hope you like signing up with all your personal data and credit card information on app stores that make Apple look like saints, because that’s where this is headed, and sadly you’ll drag me with you.

    Isn't that also a problem with Apple? And any specific app? In any case I've never signed up with any app store nor am I going to.

    Because again this hypothetical thing you bought might be a family member buying it, so it won’t even be up to you at that point.

    I mean, it's their device, why do you care? You can educate them but you can't make the right choices for them nor can I for you.

    The way to avoid it is to get rid of app stores completely, and have users download and install apps one by one. Like that’s going to happen.

    Do you mean like the way everyone installs programs on Windows and has for the last two and a half decades?

  • Clearly the author doesn't understand how capitalism works. If Apple can pick you up by the neck, turn you upside down, and shake whatever extra money it can from you then it absolutely will do so.

    The problem is that one indie developer doesn't have any power over Apple... so they can go fuck themselves. The developer is granted the opportunity to grovel at the feet of their betters (richers) and pray that they are allowed to keep enough of their own crop to survive the winter. If they don't survive... then some other dev will probably jump at the chance to take part in the "free market" and demonstrate their worth.

  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 47 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    483 Aufrufe
    S
    They could have identified me, that's the point. We couldn't identify the criminals because that example was before facial recognition. You read the article but you still don't get it.
  • 575 Stimmen
    114 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    T
    a toddler giving another toddler some milk.
  • What Does a Post-Google Internet Look Like

    Technology technology
    42
    92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    584 Aufrufe
    blisterexe@lemmy.zipB
    I'm just sad I'm too young to have ever seen that old internet, and what it was like... Makes me more determined to try and steer the current internet back in that direction though.
  • No JS, No CSS, No HTML: online "clubs" celebrate plainer websites

    Technology technology
    205
    2
    772 Stimmen
    205 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    R
    Gemini is just a web replacement protocol. With basic things we remember from olden days Web, but with everything non-essential removed, for a client to be doable in a couple of days. I have my own Gemini viewer, LOL. This for me seems a completely different application from torrents. I was dreaming for a thing similar to torrent trackers for aggregating storage and computation and indexing and search, with search and aggregation and other services' responses being structured and standardized, and cryptographic identities, and some kind of market services to sell and buy storage and computation in unified and pooled, but transparent way (scripted by buyer\seller), similar to MMORPG markets, with the representation (what is a siloed service in modern web) being on the client native application, and those services allowing to build any kind of client-server huge system on them, that being global. But that's more of a global Facebook\Usenet\whatever, a killer of platforms. Their infrastructure is internal, while their representation is public on the Internet. I want to make infrastructure public on the Internet, and representation client-side, sharing it for many kinds of applications. Adding another layer to the OSI model, so to say, between transport and application layer. For this application: I think you could have some kind of Kademlia-based p2p with groups voluntarily joined (involving very huge groups) where nodes store replicas of partitions of group common data based on their pseudo-random identifiers and/or some kind of ring built from those identifiers, to balance storage and resilience. If a group has a creator, then you can have replication factor propagated signed by them, and membership too signed by them. But if having a creator (even with cryptographically delegated decisions) and propagating changes by them is not ok, then maybe just using whole data hash, or it's bittorrent-like info tree hash, as namespace with peers freely joining it can do. Then it may be better to partition not by parts of the whole piece, but by info tree? I guess making it exactly bittorrent-like is not a good idea, rather some kind of block tree, like for a filesystem, and a separate piece of information to lookup which file is in which blocks. If we are doing directory structure. Then, with freely joining it, there's no need in any owners or replication factors, I guess just pseudorandom distribution of hashes will do, and each node storing first partitions closest to its hash. Now thinking about it, such a system would be not that different from bittorrent and can even be interoperable with it. There's the issue of updates, yes, hence I've started with groups having hierarchy of creators, who can make or accept those updates. Having that and the ability to gradually store one group's data to another group, it should be possible to do forks of a certain state. But that line of thought makes reusing bittorrent only possible for part of the system. The whole database is guaranteed to be more than a normal HDD (1 TB? I dunno). Absolutely guaranteed, no doubt at all. 1 TB (for example) would be someone's collection of favorite stuff, and not too rich one.
  • Deep Dive on Google's TPU (Tensor Processing Unit)

    Technology technology
    1
    45 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 27 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    123 Aufrufe
    R
    Tech execs when the shortage hits: I just had a brilliant idea! Let's just give untrained junior vibe-coding engineers the power of senior engineers, and even more AI tools. Problem solved forever, bonus please!