Next in the news:
"500k Usernames, Passwords and biometric data leaked in the latest hack"

There's a bunch of AI face generating pictures. I wonder if you can just use those. Or maybe this is just to create a new law to arrest people of uploading fake pictures...

This Person Does Not Exist | AI Human Face

Create unique faces with our AI-driven 'This Person Does Not Exist' face generator. Enjoy HD 1024x1024 faces for free. Generate up to 8 faces at once, choosing between genders or randomness. Explore the ultimate face generator tool!

(thispersonnotexist.org)

ThisPersonDoesNotExist - Random AI Generated Photos of Fake Persons

Generate random human face in 1 click and download it! AI generated fake person photos: man, woman or child.

(this-person-does-not-exist.com)

Listing already exists, but in practice it's quite impractical, mainly because it's either not granular enough or too granular.

If the listing feature allows me to allow/deny on a domain basis, then allowing Wikipedia for example would mean that I'd also allow all the non-child-friendly content on there too. Like the literal full-length porn videos or the photographies of genital torture that are on there. And if I block all of Wikipedia, I also block all of the hundreds of thousands of informative and totally child-acceptable pages on there.

If, on the other hand, I allow/deny on a per-page basis, then using the internet becomes nigh unmanageable, because each click of my kid requires me to allow/deny the next page. It's not that often when using the internet that you access the same exact url every day without clicking to sub-pages.

A header would solve that issue. That way I could e.g. allow all Wikipedia articles that are rated for ages 6 and that's ok. The rating should of course be like for movies, so that it doesn't mean that a child would understand the articles, but that there's nothing child-endangering in there like the videos and images (and accompanying texts) mentioned above.

Are they asking for selfies, or selfies of the user? Important difference.

Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.

How about I upload a dick Pic? That should do.

Which has been possible for decades now. People are just so dumb and lazy they rather accept a deep invasion of everyone's privacy.

Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.

Well, I guess i am going to be regularly updating the metadata on my most recent selfie.

This. Can't believe we're seeing "lol Reddit sucks" when this is a country-wide implementation and has nothing to do with Reddit in particular.

And it would know the difference how?

I'm not the person you were replying to but maybe the limit of using the websites like the ones I posted is you can't reuse the same face (at least not than I'm aware of).

So if you are in the UK and you upload 2 selfies from the site and the facial recognition pattern is different from each other, then the system which Reddit is using might reject it.

This is only a guess though.

Those that have entered into the shadow contract. A shadow contract is one of few mechanisms to enter large-scale consensus (it isn't THAT large when compared to a solar or galactic scale, but large enough for planetary control, and with some clever management, can scale larger).

Consensus requires untrusted sovereigns agreeing to collective action. It is a very difficult mechanism to operate. One way is by having a crime so heinous, the mass population block would eviscerate you if it came to light.

Pedophilia is king among these shadow cornerstones. It illustrates a total lack of empathy, no protective nature towards the innocent, no concern for the perceptions of society, high intellect / manipulation abilities, and a willingness to do anything. You can say it is the "panther" among the shadows.

So most leadership is among that tribe, which is why they are the way they are. It is only logical.

There are other tribes as well. Use your imagination and the answers will follow.

Funny thing, Reddit did that "circle" event many years ago. How big did anyone's circle get? That is an example of what I am explaining. It is nearly game theoretically impossible to have large scale consensus without some mechanism to make sure people are on the same page.

Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.

Or just block wikipedia and use one of the many encyclopedia websites designed for kids instead (1), (2). This has the benefit of having your goals met, without making the world a worse place for everyone else.

They can see and manage the router remotely no reason why they couldn't do it. Mine let's me turn off the router lights, change the WiFi password or turn of the WiFi all together.

What if I'm actually a set of traffic lights and the AI can't work out what I am from my selfie?

POV: You're the intern tasked with reviewing the selfies.

Did you not read my proposal? How does sending a header with extra information make the world a worse place for everyone else?

Please explain in detail, so I know you aren't just a troll who needs to oppose everything just because?

Lmao when the "anonymous" online forum requires de-anonymizing, I want to hope everyone leaves