Reddit users in the UK must now upload selfies to access NSFW subreddits
Technology
269
Beiträge
180
Kommentatoren
859
Aufrufe
-
Next in the news:
"500k Usernames, Passwords and biometric data leaked in the latest hack"Remember those are just the ones you hear about. Plenty happen and are never talked about by either side for obvious reasons.
-
Can the AI determine if I'm just uploading photos of Kier Starmer as my ID?
The current answer is that it is very difficult to determine if something was AI generated at scale, and if someone puts some effort in its effectively impossible currently.
-
Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.
This is the facebook "show a video of your face" bs all over again. glad i don't have an account on either site bc not only is it a huge privacy concern, you know they store all that data and are going to sell it and/or use it to train AI models
-
Verification posts are only for if you're uploading photos. This new verification will be required before you can even view these communities.
I also think you don't need to identify yourself in those? Like, you show your Internet nickname only?
-
Just post on them. Two birds with one stone.
But if you do comply, double down by ringing Kier Starmer up and letting him (and your local MP) know what you've been wanking off to, since he's so fucking interested. He could have blocked this, but he let it run because he also agrees with it.
I wonder if there's a browser addon to make an itemised list of all the videos and camgirls and then I can send it to him on a regular basis. It should log when you close the browser window so it knows when you've "finished" so to speak. Maybe I could highlight those videos in bold for him, so he can skip right to the good ones.
this is actually a really good idea. nice proposal
-
Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.
"Stephen Fry has an awful lot of Reddit accounts."
-
Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.
How about I upload a dick Pic? That should do.
-
Your ISP doesn’t see which device accesses the Internet. They only see their router.
OTOH, most routers already have features to block websites for specific client devices. But good luck putting the onus on the parents to configure that properly.
They can see and manage the router remotely no reason why they couldn't do it. Mine let's me turn off the router lights, change the WiFi password or turn of the WiFi all together.
-
is reddit still alive? it must be 100% bot on bot action by now...
Lemmy is heavily botted as well. They are the ones making the majority of the posts.
-
Next in the news:
"500k Usernames, Passwords and biometric data leaked in the latest hack"So...coming soon: an app that can match up images of friends or colleagues with a summary of their pornography preferences.
This could at least liven up some boring meetings or dull parties...
-
There's a bunch of AI face generating pictures. I wonder if you can just use those. Or maybe this is just to create a new law to arrest people of uploading fake pictures...
This Person Does Not Exist | AI Human Face
Create unique faces with our AI-driven 'This Person Does Not Exist' face generator. Enjoy HD 1024x1024 faces for free. Generate up to 8 faces at once, choosing between genders or randomness. Explore the ultimate face generator tool!
(thispersonnotexist.org)
ThisPersonDoesNotExist - Random AI Generated Photos of Fake Persons
Generate random human face in 1 click and download it! AI generated fake person photos: man, woman or child.
(this-person-does-not-exist.com)
Are they asking for selfies, or selfies of the user? Important difference.
-
Listing already exists, but in practice it's quite impractical, mainly because it's either not granular enough or too granular.
If the listing feature allows me to allow/deny on a domain basis, then allowing Wikipedia for example would mean that I'd also allow all the non-child-friendly content on there too. Like the literal full-length porn videos or the photographies of genital torture that are on there. And if I block all of Wikipedia, I also block all of the hundreds of thousands of informative and totally child-acceptable pages on there.
If, on the other hand, I allow/deny on a per-page basis, then using the internet becomes nigh unmanageable, because each click of my kid requires me to allow/deny the next page. It's not that often when using the internet that you access the same exact url every day without clicking to sub-pages.
A header would solve that issue. That way I could e.g. allow all Wikipedia articles that are rated for ages 6 and that's ok. The rating should of course be like for movies, so that it doesn't mean that a child would understand the articles, but that there's nothing child-endangering in there like the videos and images (and accompanying texts) mentioned above.
-
Are they asking for selfies, or selfies of the user? Important difference.
And it would know the difference how?
-
Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.
Lmao when the "anonymous" online forum requires de-anonymizing, I want to hope everyone leaves
-
How about I upload a dick Pic? That should do.
"That's a crime what you are doing"
"What, taking a leak?"
"No, holding a little boy's dick"
laugh track playing, with accompanying drumroll
-
Which has been possible for decades now. People are just so dumb and lazy they rather accept a deep invasion of everyone's privacy.
Yes. But honestly one of the main complains I've seen is not that this is wrong, but that they passed the law without having planned how they should do it while keeping the users safe and private.
Having a WiFi for kids and WiFi for adults could achieve the desired result without really compromising privacy (I think, but I'm not sure), or even enhancing it, since using Facebook on a kids WiFi would mean that Facebook thinks that you are a kids and KONWS they can't legally track you
Also we could change some dumb rules on other like no posting nudity, since now if a user is using an adult WiFi, they should be treaded as adults. Want to post nudes on twitter? Sure, tag it as such and only adults will see them
In 5minutes on Lemmy we have come up with better ideas than the current law. They didn't think about this nor heard the critics that have been saying this is a bad idea for years
But then again. What can we expect from people that trus t electronic voting
Edit: forgot this was about the UK. iDK if they have electronic voting
-
Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.
POV: You're the intern tasked with reviewing the selfies.
-
Well, I guess i am going to be regularly updating the metadata on my most recent selfie.
Oh dear. What a dreadful business.
Anyway, this is mine.
-
This. Can't believe we're seeing "lol Reddit sucks" when this is a country-wide implementation and has nothing to do with Reddit in particular.
So, the UK sucks.
-
And it would know the difference how?
I'm not the person you were replying to but maybe the limit of using the websites like the ones I posted is you can't reuse the same face (at least not than I'm aware of).
So if you are in the UK and you upload 2 selfies from the site and the facial recognition pattern is different from each other, then the system which Reddit is using might reject it.
This is only a guess though.
