Skip to content
linux-nerds.org

linux-nerds.org
  1. Übersicht
  2. Technology
  3. The end of Windows 10 is approaching, so it's time to consider Linux and LibreOffice

The end of Windows 10 is approaching, so it's time to consider Linux and LibreOffice

Technology
196 115 178
Anmelden zum Antworten

  • infiniporn@lemmy.worldI

    I made a porn scroller without the clutter

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • E

    Microsoft finally bids farewell to PowerShell 2.0

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    67 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    B
    Batch scripts run on my locked-down work laptop. Powershell requires administrator privileges that I don't have. I don't make the rules, I just evade them
  • R

    Google hit with $314m fine for collecting data from idle Android phones without permission

    Technology technology
    62
    1
    807 Stimmen
    62 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    P
    Yes, indeed this was just a copy error. Thanks for pointing it out.
  • R

    Hire Mean Stack Developers From Spaculus Software

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • K

    Comment utiliser ChatGPT : le guide complet - BDM

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • G

    I Counted All of the Yurts in Mongolia Using Machine Learning

    Technology technology
    9
    17 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    G
    I'd say, when there's a policy and its goals aren't reached, that's a policy failure. If people don't like the policy, that's an issue but it's a separate issue. It doesn't seem likely that people prefer living in tents, though. But to be fair, the government may be doing the best it can. It's ranked "Flawed Democracy" by The Economist Democracy Index. That's really good, I'd say, considering the circumstances. They are placed slightly ahead of Argentina and Hungary. OP has this to say: Due to the large number of people moving to urban locations, it has been difficult for the government to build the infrastructure needed for them. The informal settlements that grew from this difficulty are now known as ger districts. There have been many efforts to formalize and develop these areas. The Law on Allocation of Land to Mongolian Citizens for Ownership, passed in 2002, allowed for existing ger district residents to formalize the land they settled, and allowed for others to receive land from the government into the future. Along with the privatization of land, the Mongolian government has been pushing for the development of ger districts into areas with housing blocks connected to utilities. The plan for this was published in 2014 as Ulaanbaatar 2020 Master Plan and Development Approaches for 2030. Although progress has been slow (Choi and Enkhbat 7), they have been making progress in building housing blocks in ger distrcts. Residents of ger districts sell or exchange their plots to developers who then build housing blocks on them. Often this is in exchange for an apartment in the building, and often the value of the apartment is less than the land they originally had (Choi and Enkhbat 15). Based on what I’ve read about the ger districts, they have been around since at least the 1970s, and progress on developing them has been slow. When ineffective policy results in a large chunk of the populace generationally living in yurts on the outskirts of urban areas, it’s clear that there is failure. Choi, Mack Joong, and Urandulguun Enkhbat. “Distributional Effects of Ger Area Redevelopment in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.” International Journal of Urban Sciences, vol. 24, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 50–68. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2019.1571433.
  • F

    Minnesota Shooting Suspect Allegedly Used Data Broker Sites to Find Targets’ Addresses

    Technology technology
    75
    1
    635 Stimmen
    75 Beiträge
    154 Aufrufe
    D
    theyll only stop selling politicians and block that
  • P

    Community Notes vanishes from X feeds, raising 'serious questions' amid ongoing EU probe

    Technology technology
    94
    1
    462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    172 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.