Skip to content

Steam Users Rally Behind Anti-Censorship Petition

Technology
243 128 4.4k
  • I have been exploring ways to pay for things anonymously... in Canada and the US they do have prepaid credit cards (rhat are sadly visa or Mastercard based) that can be paid for in cash and activated without the need for a name or anything. Meaning unless you activated it on your phone or clearnet without a VPN it will be difficult to link it to you directly. Doubly so if you wait long enough for the store's surveillance footage to be cycled through (few places keep security camera footage in perpetuity, many delete stuff from a few months back or a year or so back unless something suspicious happened, meaning the footage of you buying the thing will be gone.)

    So that's one trick to be able to pay for something with a credit card without it being immediately obvious who you are. Much like paying in cash, another thing i am getting back into.

    Hmm yeah, personally I don't mind them having access to my transactions or doing things anonymously. Using your bankcard with chip to pay is already obfuscated in most situations on the receiving end since a lot of cash registers will group the transactions together and way out once.

    Even platforms like Mollie sometimes obfuscate transactions, which annoys me, considering I have worked as a bookkeeper and now an accountant.

    Because of my job, I don't want people to get the feeling I do shit wrong (illegal or otherwise) since that can cause me to lose my licence. So I want to be transparent for that and for my own administration.

    At the same time cash is disappearing here in NL and in some countries cash transactions above 3k are already banned (BE f.e.).
    I also buy a fair amount by buying gift cards, and I order online a lot.

    Ow and btw Mullvad can be both by sending them an envelope with cash

  • Unfortunately rich and developed countries with an iron grip on the markets by a few billionaires that control them you see. They ensure our options are limited.

    Canadians have very limited choices in terms of services. Even our grocery store shelves are bought out by major corps and local options struggle to get their products on the shelves.

    As another example, our banks have no interpayment systems outside the interac system, and they have no standard apis for payment services. So things like apps for managing budgets involve downloading a csv after our billing date passes and a lot of manual work. Most banks offer their own budget apps and they only work with their services.

    We have effectively have 3 phone and internet providers.. or little guys that resell access to the big 3.

    The monopoly man won the game in Canada.

    Hmm, in the US, people have at least Simplefin to connect their banks to Actual Budget f.e.

    Man it sucks to live in Canada as well it seems, probably the best thing you can do is buy local as much as possibile and if they still accept cash use that.

  • Hmm, in the US, people have at least Simplefin to connect their banks to Actual Budget f.e.

    Man it sucks to live in Canada as well it seems, probably the best thing you can do is buy local as much as possibile and if they still accept cash use that.

    That is how I do it yes. As much as feasibly possible. I do really miss the local PC shops and electronics stores.. sadly my options for that stuff now are Staples, Best Buy and Amazon...

  • Hmm yeah, personally I don't mind them having access to my transactions or doing things anonymously. Using your bankcard with chip to pay is already obfuscated in most situations on the receiving end since a lot of cash registers will group the transactions together and way out once.

    Even platforms like Mollie sometimes obfuscate transactions, which annoys me, considering I have worked as a bookkeeper and now an accountant.

    Because of my job, I don't want people to get the feeling I do shit wrong (illegal or otherwise) since that can cause me to lose my licence. So I want to be transparent for that and for my own administration.

    At the same time cash is disappearing here in NL and in some countries cash transactions above 3k are already banned (BE f.e.).
    I also buy a fair amount by buying gift cards, and I order online a lot.

    Ow and btw Mullvad can be both by sending them an envelope with cash

    Ow and btw Mullvad can be both by sending them an envelope with cash

    I am afraid I don't understand. You can buy credit cards by mailing cash to Mullvad?

    Using your bankcard with chip to pay is already obfuscated in most situations on the receiving end since a lot of cash registers will group the transactions together and way out once.

    I actually rarely pay for things with my bank card. I usually buy with credit card and that will always leave a trace. But it is good to know that.

    The whole no cash purchase over 3K or 10K is honestly crap. They did that in Quebec last year and are going to do that throughout Canada. I never paid for anything with that much cash, but I still find it shit.

  • Ow and btw Mullvad can be both by sending them an envelope with cash

    I am afraid I don't understand. You can buy credit cards by mailing cash to Mullvad?

    Using your bankcard with chip to pay is already obfuscated in most situations on the receiving end since a lot of cash registers will group the transactions together and way out once.

    I actually rarely pay for things with my bank card. I usually buy with credit card and that will always leave a trace. But it is good to know that.

    The whole no cash purchase over 3K or 10K is honestly crap. They did that in Quebec last year and are going to do that throughout Canada. I never paid for anything with that much cash, but I still find it shit.

    Sorry Mullvad is a VPN company, just in case you need that.

    I always buy things with a normal bank card, why would I use a credit card on a daily basis? You will have less grip on your finances, they aren't accepted everywhere, cost more than a bank account which you still need anyway, they are at a greater risk of getting abused and in most countries using them can only ruin your credit score.

    The whole no cash purchase over 3K or 10K is honestly crap. They did that in Quebec last year and are going to do that throughout Canada. I never paid for anything with that much cash, but I still find it shit.

    That's the thing, any normal working human being will basically never come in a situation where this happens, and if they do, it is generally a simple explanation.

    I understand privacy minded people don't really like this, but it does help find criminals.
    That's also a bit of an issue since high levels of privacy also mean that criminals basically have fair game since catching them will be harder.

  • Sorry Mullvad is a VPN company, just in case you need that.

    I always buy things with a normal bank card, why would I use a credit card on a daily basis? You will have less grip on your finances, they aren't accepted everywhere, cost more than a bank account which you still need anyway, they are at a greater risk of getting abused and in most countries using them can only ruin your credit score.

    The whole no cash purchase over 3K or 10K is honestly crap. They did that in Quebec last year and are going to do that throughout Canada. I never paid for anything with that much cash, but I still find it shit.

    That's the thing, any normal working human being will basically never come in a situation where this happens, and if they do, it is generally a simple explanation.

    I understand privacy minded people don't really like this, but it does help find criminals.
    That's also a bit of an issue since high levels of privacy also mean that criminals basically have fair game since catching them will be harder.

    Large cash payments may be needed in places and during times where non-cash are difficult or impossible. I have family who live in countries where having bank transfers would be cumbersome and are riddled with corruption, so I bring them cash. I once did get 9,500$ in cash (below the 10K limit) and they were paying for repairs for their home and the workers could only accept cash. Having a digital platform would have made all this impossible.

  • Large cash payments may be needed in places and during times where non-cash are difficult or impossible. I have family who live in countries where having bank transfers would be cumbersome and are riddled with corruption, so I bring them cash. I once did get 9,500$ in cash (below the 10K limit) and they were paying for repairs for their home and the workers could only accept cash. Having a digital platform would have made all this impossible.

    Well that is generally not an issue it is more the receiving end they check. If you take it from your bank there is a non issue besides maybe at a border.

    And most completely corrupt countries don’t care either way

  • No it’s incredibly idiotic to do otherwise.

    You don’t fight a fire while the arsonist is still setting it on fire.

  • Looking at the partners on that page, I think at least half of them are more than okay with Collective Shout's actions.

    Most of them are charities and probably don’t know they’re supporting transphobia.

  • No it’s incredibly idiotic to do otherwise.

    You don’t fight a fire while the arsonist is still setting it on fire.

    Except they're not fighting the fire here, they're taking away the arsonist's flamethrowser so he can't continue making the fire. Without that flamethrower, the arsonist can't do shit.

    Fighting the fire would be petitioning Steam, but the target is the payment processors that pressured Steam on request of Collective Shout.

  • Fighting the fire happens after stopping the person lighting the fire. Focus on the immediate threat, don’t get distracted by the lofty long term.

  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 176 Stimmen
    81 Beiträge
    357 Aufrufe
    kokesh@lemmy.worldK
    I want to sell my gold teeth
  • 87 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    84 Aufrufe
    S
    What's the difference? They all look the same. Let's call him the boy with the golden spoon in his mouth who got offended.
  • 37 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    P
    Idk if it’s content blocking on my end but I can’t tell you how upset I am that the article had no pictures of the contraption or a video of it in action.
  • Brain activity lower when using AI chatbots: MIT research

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    127 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    129 Aufrufe
    Z
    Depends how much clutch is left ‍
  • 92 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    57 Aufrufe
    H
    This is interesting to me as I like to say the llms are basically another abstraction of search. Initially it was links with no real weight that had to be gone through and then various algorithms weighted the return, then the results started giving a small blurb so one did not have to follow every link, and now your basically getting a report which should have references to the sources. I would like to see this looking at how folks engage with an llm. Basically my guess is if one treats the llm as a helper and collaborates to create the product that they will remember more than if they treat it as a servant and just instructs them to do it and takes the output as is.
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    339 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 44 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    G
    It varies based on local legislation, so in some places paying ransoms is banned but it's by no means universal. It's totally valid to be against paying ransoms wherever possible, but it's not entirely black and white in some situations. For example, what if a hospital gets ransomed? Say they serve an area not served by other facilities, and if they can't get back online quickly people will die? Sounds dramatic, but critical public services get ransomed all the time and there are undeniable real world consequences. Recovery from ransomware can cost significantly more than a ransom payment if you're not prepared. It can also take months to years to recover, especially if you're simultaneously fighting to evict a persistent (annoyed, unpaid) threat actor from your environment. For the record I don't think ransoms should be paid in most scenarios, but I do think there is some nuance to consider here.