Skip to content

In Militarizing Push, Russian School Children To Build Drones

Technology
36 21 0
  • How can websites verify unique (IRL) identities?

    Technology technology
    6
    8 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    H
    Safe, yeah. Private, no. If you want to verify whether a user is a real person, you need very personally identifiable information. That’s not ever going to be private. The best you could do, in theory, is have a government service that takes that PII and gives the user a signed cryptographic certificate they can use to verify their identity. Most people would either lose their private key or have it stolen, so even that system would have problems. The closest to reality you could do right now is use Apple’s FaceID, and that’s anything but private. Pretty safe though. It’s super illegal and quite hard to steal someone’s face.
  • Elon Musk’s SpaceX Starship explodes on test stand

    Technology technology
    51
    218 Stimmen
    51 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    M
    Are the cars shitty, or are they ranked 3rd?
  • 15 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    P
    WTF I looked for something like this for a while and this never popped up. Awesome.
  • Understanding the impacts of generative AI use on children

    Technology technology
    4
    50 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    S
    That's fine, just use ChatGPT...
  • The Army’s Newest Recruits: Tech Execs From Meta, OpenAI and More

    Technology technology
    9
    26 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    D
    How much you want to bet they will immediately leverage for their profits before military.
  • 46 Stimmen
    35 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    M
    You guys sure display a crazy obsession with "Apple Fanboys" in this sub… The amount of Applephobia… Phew! As if the new release had you all flustered or something… Gotta take a bite and taste the Apple at some point! Can’t stay in the closet forever, ya know?
  • 463 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • Are We All Becoming More Hostile Online?

    Technology technology
    31
    1
    213 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    A
    Back in the day I just assumed everyone was lying. Or trying to get people worked up, and we called them trolls. Learning how to ignore the trolls, and not having trust for strangers on the internet, coupled with the ability to basically not care what random people said is a lost art. Somehow people forgot to give other the people this memo, including the "you don't fucking join social networks as your self". Anonymity makes this all work. Eternal September newbies just didn't get it.