Skip to content

Grok 4 has been so badly neutered that it's now programmed to see what Elon says about the topic at hand and blindly parrot that line.

Technology
67 55 0
  • How to transform your Neovim to Cursor in minutes - Composio

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • You are Already On "The List"

    Technology technology
    2
    47 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    M
    Even if they're wrong. It's too late. You're already on the list. .... The only option is to destroy the list and those who will use it
  • 40K IoT cameras worldwide stream secrets to anyone with a browser.

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    119 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    69 Aufrufe
    T
    For the Emperor!
  • Why Silicon Valley Needs Immigration

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    36 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    anarch157a@lemmy.dbzer0.comA
    "Because theyŕe greedy fucks". There, saved you a click.
  • 1k Stimmen
    145 Beiträge
    422 Aufrufe
    P
    Not just that. The tax preparation industry has gotten tax more complex and harder to file in the US You get the government you can afford. The tax preparation industry has been able to buy several governments
  • 0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    D
    I don't think accuracy is an issue either. I've been on the web since inception and we always had a terribly inaccurate information landscape. It's really about individual ability to put together found information to an accurate world model and LLMs is a tool just like any other. The real issues imo are effects on society be it information manipulation, breaking our education and workforce systems. But all of that is overshadowed by meme issues like energy use or inaccuracy as these are easy to understand for any person while sociology, politics and macro economics are really hard.
  • 1 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    L
    I think the principle could be applied to scan outside of the machine. It is making requests to 127.0.0.1:{port} - effectively using your computer as a "server" in a sort of reverse-SSRF attack. There's no reason it can't make requests to 10.10.10.1:{port} as well. Of course you'd need to guess the netmask of the network address range first, but this isn't that hard. In fact, if you consider that at least as far as the desktop site goes, most people will be browsing the web behind a standard consumer router left on defaults where it will be the first device in the DHCP range (e.g. 192.168.0.1 or 10.10.10.1), which tends to have a web UI on the LAN interface (port 8080, 80 or 443), then you'd only realistically need to scan a few addresses to determine the network address range. If you want to keep noise even lower, using just 192.168.0.1:80 and 192.168.1.1:80 I'd wager would cover 99% of consumer routers. From there you could assume that it's a /24 netmask and scan IPs to your heart's content. You could do top 10 most common ports type scans and go in-depth on anything you get a result on. I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work, when I was testing 13ft.io - a self-hosted 12ft.io paywall remover, an SSRF flaw like this absolutely let you perform any network request to any LAN address in range.