Skip to content

Grok’s ‘spicy’ video setting instantly made me Taylor Swift nude deepfakes

Technology
102 58 0
  • 12 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    J
    They haven't even really completed the pump stage yet, and they already want to move on to dump? This won't end well...
  • Watermarks offer no defense against deepfakes, study suggests

    Technology technology
    30
    1
    190 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    198 Aufrufe
    K
    You can have whatever token you want with all the metadata, licensing and ownership information you want... ...unless you plan on only seeing images in your own platform, nobody gives a shit, people will take screenshots and image files and share and use them however they want. There's no world in which you load a full DRM plugin or do 4 different types of handshake with a full blockchain just to load a jpeg into a comment.
  • 106 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    324 Aufrufe
    D
    Wait, we need compulsory ID checks to visit adult content but no checks with Chatgpt who is there to help you plan your suicide? We are about to face an epidemic of AI cat fishing, scams, and unhealthy relationships that corporations are pushing on us. This is like the Atomic bomb only with propaganda and psychological manipulation. The war for the human mind just got a shortcut and the Techbros are in charge.
  • 356 Stimmen
    74 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    kairubyte@lemmy.dbzer0.comK
    To be fair, icon theming was terrible in most previous betas too. I highly doubt they are focusing on that aspect pretty hard in the dev betas.
  • Say Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagate

    Technology technology
    263
    1
    615 Stimmen
    263 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    M
    Really sad that S3 prices are still that high... also hetzner storage boxes
  • 737 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    928 Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • 253 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    504 Aufrufe
    W
    Did you, by any chance, ever wonder, why people deal with hunger instead of just eating cake?
  • How the Signal Knockoff App TeleMessage Got Hacked in 20 Minutes

    Technology technology
    31
    1
    188 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    369 Aufrufe
    P
    Not to mention TeleMessage violated the terms of the GPL. Signal is under gpl and I can't find TeleMessage's code anywhere. Edit: it appears it is online somewhere just not in a github repo or anything https://micahflee.com/heres-the-source-code-for-the-unofficial-signal-app-used-by-trump-officials/