Skip to content

YouTube’s new anti-adblock measures

Technology
48 42 0
  • Study finds persistent spike in hate speech on X

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    37 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    tommasz@lemmy.worldT
    I wouldn't say it's a "spike", Bob.
  • How not to lose your job to AI

    Technology technology
    13
    1
    9 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    R
    Yeah, I was thinking about production code when I wrote that. Usually I can get something working faster that way, and for tests it can speed things up, too. But the code is so terrible in general Edit: production isn’t exactly what I was thinking. Just like. Up to some standards above just working
  • Pornhub is Back in France.

    Technology technology
    30
    1
    271 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    P
    Translation: dicks out
  • 268 Stimmen
    76 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    C
    God forbid he should have asked his parents. Or the kids nanny.
  • 308 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 297 Stimmen
    24 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    S
    This is not a typical home or office printer, very specialized.
  • 66 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    F
    HE is amazing. their BGP looking glass tool is also one of my favorite troubleshooting tools for backbone issues. 10/10 ISP
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet