Skip to content

YouTube’s new anti-adblock measures

Technology
57 48 228
  • 20 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    sentient_loom@sh.itjust.worksS
    Nobody's complaining about the simple.wikipedia part, but you already know that.
  • Google Killed Your Attention Span with SEO-Friendly Articles

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    111 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 198 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    D
    This guy gets it. And from my professional experience, Gen Z sucks at separating the two.
  • 30 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    31 Aufrufe
    I
    That is a drive unit. The robot is bending down next to it wearing a vest.
  • What Does a Post-Google Internet Look Like

    Technology technology
    42
    92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    187 Aufrufe
    blisterexe@lemmy.zipB
    I'm just sad I'm too young to have ever seen that old internet, and what it was like... Makes me more determined to try and steer the current internet back in that direction though.
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    59
    321 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    219 Aufrufe
    I
    Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy imagine you’re a YouTuber and want to accept donations: that will force you to give out your name to them, which they could use to get your address and phone number. There’s always someone that hates you, and I rather not have them knowing my personal info Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto if you’re the seller then it’s a lot better. With the traditional banking system, with enough knowledge you can cheat both sides: stolen cards, abusive chargebacks, bank accounts in other countries under fake name/fake ID… Crypto simplifies scamming when the seller, and pretty much makes it impossible for buyers What specifically are you boycotting? Card payments, international tranfers, national transfers taking days to complete, money being seizable at all times many banks lose money on them Their plans are basically all focused on the card you get. Pretty sure they make money with it, else many wouldn’t offer cash back (selling infos and getting a fee from card payments?) if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. Banks are evil anyways, does it really change anything? The difference is that it technically helps everyone using crypto, not only the rich. Plus P2P exchanges are a thing You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less That’s just factually false. Do you know the price of a swift transfer? Now compare it to crypto tx fees, with many being under $0.01
  • Mergulhe em Aventuras Digitais com a MerwomanPG

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Unionize or die - Drew DeVault

    Technology technology
    3
    75 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    W
    and hopefully also elsewhere. as Drew said in the first part, tech workers will be affected by billionaire's decisions even outside of work, on multiple fronts. we must eat the rich, or they will eat us all alive.