Skip to content

YouTube’s new anti-adblock measures

Technology
43 37 0
  • 15 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    dabster291@lemmy.zipD
    Why does the title use a korean letter as a divider?
  • Tough, Tiny, and Totally Repairable: Inside the Framework 12

    Technology technology
    106
    1
    545 Stimmen
    106 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    W
    ok, I most often type with 2 hands, but I have issues holding my tablet sized laptop for a longer time, so it's hard to even just keep reading on it. and it does not even have an HDD inside. I have no such problems with my phone, I could hold it probably for hours.
  • Microsoft Tests Removing Its Name From Bing Search Box

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    54 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    alphapuggle@programming.devA
    Worse. Office.com now takes me to m365.cloud.microsoft which as of today now takes me to a fucking Copilot chat window. Ofc no way to disable it because gee why would anyone want to do that?
  • 258 Stimmen
    46 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    stzyxh@feddit.orgS
    yea i also were there at a few thousand I think and the content has changed a lot since then.
  • 59 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    D
    This sounds like pokemon
  • 39 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    C
    I believed they were doing such things against budding competitors long before the LLM era. My test is simple. Replace it with China. Would the replies be the opposite of what you've recieved so far? The answer is yes. Absolutely people would be frothing at the mouth about China being bad actors. Western tech bros are just as paranoid, they copy off others, they steal ideas. When we do it it's called "innovation".
  • 93 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 77 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    F
    https://web.archive.org/web/20250526132003/https://www.yahoo.com/news/cias-communications-suffered-catastrophic-compromise-started-iran-090018710.html?ref=404media.co